Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone seen proof for/against the preferences really being treated as the brochure states? We now have a good school nearby (phew) but there are two other schools that we'd love to get into even more although we don't think we will realistically get in - but it would be great to be on the waiting list of at least one of them just in case a place comes up at some point.


Should we just put the unlikely schools in places 1 and 2 and the likely one in place 3 (as long as we're happy in the odd case we ARE offered a place in school 1 or 2)? Does it really, really, really not make it less likely that we will get into our safe bet #3 than families who put that school first but live 50 meters further away?


I know it's all safe in theory but not all software works as it should...

My experience same as Cora's. After much deliberation & confusion, we placed our top choice 1st, next choice 2nd etc. We were offered our nearest school, which we had placed 3rd, and then got offered a place at our 1st choice school in July.


We also have friends at our daughter's school who placed it low on their list as they presumed they wouldn't get in as they lived too far away. They ended up at a school they were unhappy with & requested to be put on the waiting list for our school and were offered a place (based on proximity) after the first week of term.


Good luck. It's all very stressful, isn't it?

My understanding is a computer does all the work ... For each school, ranking all applicants then for each child, looking at each choice in turn, starting with the first, until it finds a school where you rank highly enough to be offered a place


If you are eligible for more than one school, your offer will be for the one you chose higher up your list


It was more of a gamble when southwark gave priority to 'closest community school' above straight forward distance because if your closest community school was your first choice, you could get in ahead of other children who lived closer (but for whom another community school was their closest)


So not putting your closest school first was a bit of a gamble


That criterion no longer exists

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was a reactionary post and inappropriate when talking about a real case and a real person who was harmed.  London streets are generally pretty safe.  Sadly violent crime happens from time to time, as it always has.
    • Do tell, CPR Dave, what the spiteful jealous stuff is - I'm intrigued.  Agree - Burnham is a top class communicator (polar opposite of Starmer) he'd do a great job of uniting the party. I still think Wes Streeting has the edge, though I'm sure he has more enemies as well. 
    • This is a huge part of the problem.   Starmer is only interested in himself, not in what is best for our country.    There's a litany of stuff he's done for spiteful jealous personal reasons which has damaged the nation enormously. Burnham would be a much better leader than of the other dross left behind when Starmer goes. To inflict a worse leader (and PM) upon us for his own selfish reasons would add to the problems and be entirely in keeping with his woeful premiership so far.
    • I heard today there was a burglary in Lacon Road yesterday evening between 20.00 - 22.00,  apparently the owners were home at the time & thieves got away with electrical items along with the owners car!  Wtf!   Anyone heard anything else?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...