Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone seen proof for/against the preferences really being treated as the brochure states? We now have a good school nearby (phew) but there are two other schools that we'd love to get into even more although we don't think we will realistically get in - but it would be great to be on the waiting list of at least one of them just in case a place comes up at some point.


Should we just put the unlikely schools in places 1 and 2 and the likely one in place 3 (as long as we're happy in the odd case we ARE offered a place in school 1 or 2)? Does it really, really, really not make it less likely that we will get into our safe bet #3 than families who put that school first but live 50 meters further away?


I know it's all safe in theory but not all software works as it should...

My experience same as Cora's. After much deliberation & confusion, we placed our top choice 1st, next choice 2nd etc. We were offered our nearest school, which we had placed 3rd, and then got offered a place at our 1st choice school in July.


We also have friends at our daughter's school who placed it low on their list as they presumed they wouldn't get in as they lived too far away. They ended up at a school they were unhappy with & requested to be put on the waiting list for our school and were offered a place (based on proximity) after the first week of term.


Good luck. It's all very stressful, isn't it?

My understanding is a computer does all the work ... For each school, ranking all applicants then for each child, looking at each choice in turn, starting with the first, until it finds a school where you rank highly enough to be offered a place


If you are eligible for more than one school, your offer will be for the one you chose higher up your list


It was more of a gamble when southwark gave priority to 'closest community school' above straight forward distance because if your closest community school was your first choice, you could get in ahead of other children who lived closer (but for whom another community school was their closest)


So not putting your closest school first was a bit of a gamble


That criterion no longer exists

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do they require a direct debit?
    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...