Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I go passed the adventure playground stream in Peckham Rye Park daily and it really sticks in my claw that this piece of work should have been allowed to be completed without someone stepping in to remedy the obvious error during construction.


I have read that the adventure playground project cost 40,000 of public money and I don't think it should be allowed to be let go.


I would like to know who is responsible for the blunder and whether they have been paid and when the error will be rectified. If anyone else feels strongly enough, I would be glad to hear from you with a view to getting some information from our councillors.


I think it very important that contractors are held accountable when they are offered publicly funded projects

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21246-the-uphill-stream/
Share on other sites

pipsky2008,


I think that you probably read some of what I posted on this subject under 'Peckham Rye One O' Clock Club'.

There were a lot of mixed messages about this issue, some people blamed the architects and others the contractors; my view is that Southwark council should have ensured that this scheme was completed in working order and represented good value for OUR MONEY.

It is interesting to note that the designers, EGER Architects, no longer have any reference to this project on their website - I wonder why? My view is that ever if you take this matter up with the two councillors that had their photos taken for the opening of the playground (can't remember their names) you would'nt get very far.

I was at the One O' Clock with my Grandson today and in spite for the good work of the fine staff there it is beginning to get to look neglected. All of the shutters were closed on the windows, because there was a break in and the keys were stolen and some of the fluorescent lights were out and needed fixing. Sadly, I was told that no funding was available to remedy either and yet just outside is that glaring waste of money - the uphill play river. Our money up the drain!


Regards.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Fair enough point, but does that not in a way make it even worse if they open a shop almost directly  opposite another "family" business selling exactly the same type of products?
    • As Occado source from Waitrose, and were their only deliverer at one stage, and as Waitrose do now deliver it may be they feel their reach in ED is sufficient to mean having a local outlet would not gain them sufficient additional sales to be cost effective. The movement to delivery rather than physical shopping during Covid has I believe substantially changed the grocery economics. So it may be that the High Street dynamic for physical shops has now changed. 
    • ..... thinking about the discussion about Chango.  Their "About us" blurb on the website says started by one Argentina guy.  So if one person has a successful business and goes on to open a number of shops when do they go from a supported successful "family" business to a less liked "chain"?  
    • I used to buy a brand of olive oil called 'Il Casolare'. It was unfiltered, often on offer in Sainsbury's and came in a really nice bottle with a stopper. When it was finished, I'd soak the label off, fill it with Morrison's own-brand vermouth and use it for cooking as it lasts longer than keeping wine open. One night there was very little else left to drink, so we got into it - I told people it was a difficult to find artisanal brand I'd brought back from Barcelona and that it should be pronounced 'Vermut'. People loved it. I gave away a couple of bottles as Christmas presents the next year.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...