Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A fair society where everyone, from road sweepers

> and up, is recognised for their contribution.

>

> An end to the shift of wealth transfer from the

> lower/modest incomes to the richest 1%.



How about everyone being recognised for their criminality as well?

1) Reduce UK's exposure to banks


2) Rather than privatising public sector turn them into co-operatives


3) Invest more in the creativity industries


4) Give NHS freedom from political meddling


5) Give bonuses for success in export markets


6) Reduce taxation levels for the lower to middle incomes as these people are likely to spend more in this country unlike the rich 1% where they would spend elsewhere


7) Better planning policies to incorporate better timeless designs and longevity


8) More financial education.


9) Limitations on banking, CBI, etc lobbying


10) Increasing lobbying representatives for communities and marginalised groups


11) A fairer and open press that doesn't represent the views of a decrepit Aussie


12) Giving Unions the same powers given to Danish Unions


13) Better thought out transport policies that fitsahead of its time


14) Link success of industries to hollistic targets

Now lots of those are very good ideas (except number 4, it would be a bloody disaster), but can you honestly see ANY government being able to pull that off?


If you released that as your election manifesto, lots of people would applaud it, and you'd win the votes of many many students, but real people in real jobs, whatever class they belong to, wouldn't be able to vote for you, because of real life.


But redistributing wealth is a noble cause.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can spot a person from their language, it's

> like a fingerprint, that's not you UDT.


If it was a copy and paste job then you should be able to google the source. Good luck to finding it because the source came from me.


Edited to add: I'm going out so see you all tomorrow for more kick ass action from UDT.

I did a search on 'Danish' and can't find your comment UDT?


Re. Your comments...


'Reducing exposure to banks' as point 1 - that was my question, yeah how?


Public Sector is already cooperative, you daft wally.


Investing more in creative is an odd policy commitment, how much more and what do you think the return will be? It's esoteric, hardly working man stuff.


NHS freedom is supposed to do what? Increase expenditure? Decrease? How does that solve banking crisis?


Bonuses already exist for exports. Do you want government to pay them now?


Reduce taxation? *yawn* doesn't everyone?


Better planing designs? WTF? Is this anything to do with anything?


And so on.....

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hardly surprising as you are unable to argue

> fairly without resorting to dirty tricks and

> dishonest tactics.

>

> I didn't know I had a hairpiece, Hugo. More mud

> slinging, hey.


Dishonest tactics like facts and evidence. Hmmm, I can understand why you find those challenging UDT.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just a quick note that my son was mugged last night on Dunstans Road just after 6pm. Two youths on bikes with balaclavas stole his phone, headphones and driver’s license near the mansion block next to Dawson’s Heights. Please be vigilant when walking in the area after dark. 
    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...