Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,


I just wanted to raise awareness of proposed changes to the Kings maternity services that could have lasting impact to the care expectant and new mothers receive. I've copied the information below about these proposed changes and where to follow up if you have any feedback/comments. Speaking personally, I am currently under the care of the Grove midwives and have nothing but praise for the care I am receiving. I see the same lovely midwife for each appointment meaning excellent continuity of care, something which should be available for all new mothers. It would be a great shame for the women of Southwark if these services are not available in the future.


'King's Maternity Services is proposing a redesign of Community Midwifery Services as part of a Trust-wide mandatory staffing review. The proposal outlines organisational changes to these services at King's and includes reducing the number of caseloading midwifery teams from four to three. This means around 200 less women will have access to the true continuity of care provided by these teams. The proposal also includes plans for expanding use of the two midwife-led rooms, which we welcome, however we are concerned whether this continuity of care model will be as comprehensive as what is currently offered by the caseloading teams. The teams are Juniper, Birchtree, Electric and Grove. Also affected will be the traditional community teams, Horizon, Sunflower, Ivy Green and Serenity. King's MVP are gathering feedback from Service Users and are really keen to hear from YOU! Please post your comment to their facebook page: https://en-gb.facebook.com/KingsMaternityVoices/

or email [email protected]. The consultation period ends on 13 March, and we are working to put together our full response to the proposal and to ensure that Service User voices are heard. Thank you!'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...