Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I moved to Fernholme Road last year and I find it shocking to find a thread from 2015 about this issue?! Seems to me this speeding issue has been going on for years and I cannot believe that nothing has been done about it... in the past 3 months I've almost been hit by numerous drivers that are using this road as a shortcut and think quicker they drive cooler they are... is there something we can do about this? Or is council waiting for a car accident or child death before they stop this speeding issue?


This is a residential road but also a cut through road and unless this road has numerous speed bums this speeding will NOT STOP. Can we start a petition or get the local council to promote this suggestion to council?


Thanks Lenka

Please turn up to the meeting at Brenchley Gardens Tenants Association Hall for the Safer Neighbourhood Team meeting for Nunhead, and tell the police about your concerns. The meeting is from 6.30pm tomorrow Thursday 28th March 2019. P12 bus.
I suggest you go for road narrowing and not speed bumps unless you want your houses to shake like on every other street round here where speed bumps have gone in. I really hope after spending 10s of thousands putting in and then removing speed bumps all along Ivydale that the council does not waste more taxpayer money. The road narrowing are good.

Thank you for letting me know about this meeting. I was not aware of this meeting and as I work North London I will, sadly, not be able to attend. Does anyone know if there is another meeting scheduled for foreseeable future?


I just find it astonishing that after so many years and complains council has not done anything about it. But I guess we are dealing with Southwark council and as their previous leaseholder I am not surprise they don't care.

Go for a liveable neighbourhood / bus gate / modal filter if you can, to cut out the cut through. Most traffic calming doesn't work because through traffic inherently doesn't want to be calmed. The council put in speed humps, the anti-social brigade buy big Range Rovers that can cruise over the top of them.

the consultation is closed but it's here. https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/athenlay-road-traffic-calming/

southwark are usually OK about late comments. Surprising that as a resident you were not notified. Mail your views to your councillor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...