Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Drivers and owners feel that have a divine right to drive what they want, how they want, where they want, when they want. If you want to sort out air quality break that cycle. Government chickened out after the 2000 fuel protests. Local planning is all over the shop. ULEZ will get rid of some of the dirty vehicles but at the same time recent policies have increased congestion. Not joined up at local, regional or national level.


But back to us to take some responsibility rather than carp on about the war on motorists. And we are relatively speaking some of the better guys, have this conversation with somebody in the outer boroughs.


The alternative is birth control and culling our population, and a move to an agrarian economy. Someone tried that once, but others on this site don't think my comparison was apt. And that would also have an impact on air quality due to cooking on open fires.


Interesting fact is that air quality has generally got better since the war, with reduction and cleaning up of industry, and little burning of coal. Apart from roadside pollution.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...