Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"This splendid and easy-to-read book presents a common-sense approach to one of the biggest worries of parenthood. Dr. Gonz?lez reminds us that children know a lot more about their nutritional needs than we give them credit for and that the problem is almost always ours, not theirs." Gill Rapley, co-author of Baby-led Weaning: Helping your baby to love good food


Oh good...the problem is ours...more feel good reading....:-(

Yep. It's more the 'why don?t children like vegetables?' bit I'm interested in rather than amounts eaten (given oldest small snowboarder only really eats pasta). If it seriously can help me increase variety I'll get it!!


Do we need a forum book club?

  • 2 weeks later...
Did anyone get this? Is it useful? Am losing will to live with my 1 yr old - 2.5 weeks afer sickness bug and week later high temp (and constant streaming cold since about october) but he's still not eating proper meals (he had got better). Literally bits of toast/fruit/yoghurt and the odd bit of pasta. Need to get him back on track but how?

I was going to resurrect this thread earlier today to see how you were getting on sb!


I have got the book but have not yet managed to open it, ahem, will speed read it over the next couple of days and then you can borrow it?


Mini Sailor's eating was at an all time low for the last month but in the last few days her appetite has greatly increased.

Part of this is due to me cutting down her milk from 20oz a day to 13/14 oz a day which is actually having the desired effect and she is hungrier at meals.

She had also been ill with one bug after the other, plus the constant streaming cold, for a whole month, and though I knew this would be reducing her appetite, I had underestimated quite how much and was pretty much despairing that she was ever going to eat more than a postage stamp size piece of toast at one sitting again...

In the last 3 days of being bug free, she has started eating much more, so don't underestimate how much this may be playing a part? (I know it's hard to separate other factors from a generally, shall we say, 'economical' eater!)

I have no idea whether this purple patch will last more than a few days but it has shown me that there seems to be very little I can do to influence whether she wants to eat or not, as when she is in a non-eaty phase (er, basically the last 4 months apart from the last 48 hours) it applies to practically every food, finger foods as well as spoon feeding, even her beaker of water is shunned.

Maybe the book tells us more...I'm rather hoping it's a 'babies actually only need to eat a portion the size of a ten pence piece and actually all the other babies you see shovelling down a lasagne are radically over-eating' type of a book!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...