Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,


I'm trying to work out how easy it to find an after school/holiday nanny. My children will both be at primary school in September so we only really need childcare from 3 - 6.30 pm Monday - Friday and during the school holidays. However, I assume most nannies prefer full time jobs with regular hours (for obvious financial reasons!).


We're also considering an au pair but prefer the idea of somebody with a bit of experience who can help with homework and would like to stay with our family for a few years. We need somebody who can drive so they can take the children to after-school activities/play dates etc. and I'm not sure all au pairs would be comfortable to drive in London. Also, we'd prefer a live-out nanny.


It's a bit early to start recruiting (!) but does anybody have this sort of arrangement in place already? If so, does it work well? And was it hard to find a nanny? From the nanny point of view - would you be interested in doing this? I suppose it might fit well with somebody who'd like to work reduced hours or is studying/has other commitments.


Anyway, any thoughts or experiences anyone could share would be appreciated!


Thanks very much.


AM

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22466-after-schoolholiday-nanny/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I know childminders who do this so try them. They would have more experience and be more likely to have a car, though not sure how feasible it would be to take your kids to classes if they have other children to look after as well. My partner is a childminder and thinking of picking up a couple of after-schoolers when our son starts in September. We haven't found out where he is going yet, which would make a difference, but feel free to get in touch and if she can't do it, she knows several other childminders who might have vacancies. Good luck.

I currently work as an after-school nanny, and yes we are few and far between unfortunately. The reason I work part time like this is because I have a toddler of my own who I take to work with me.


Before I had my own child I worked full time as a nanny, and I had experience of looking after babies/toddlers alongside their older school-age therefore I knew I would be able to work in a similar situation with my own son.


I am very lucky, my employer understands that my son and I come as a package and she has no issues with his high chair being at the dining table, his little cutlery and plates in the cupboards and drawers, a few of his toys kicking around the place, and (during the holidays) providing a room for me to put a travel cot up in for him a nap. She also understands that I can't always give my undivided attention to her daughter. From the outset I felt that her priority was for someone that she felt relaxed with to pick her daughter from school. If I felt that my employer resented my son being there then the job would never have worked out. I am happy to have a reduced salary, taking account that my employer provides my son with a meal, and that I can't always give my undivided attention to my employer's daughter. I also have back-up childcare in place in case my son is sick - I can still go to work.


I am very happy in my current job and (as far as I know) my employer is happy too.


I would suggest looking at (and possibly placing an ad) in "simply childcare" (Carla is great) and if you know of any nannies speak to them and get the word out.


Good luck

Hi - thank you both! Yes, I think childminders might be the best option although I prefer the idea of them being looked after at home when they are both little. Youngest will be just 3 actually and at a pre-school (with primary school like hours). I'd be very happy to consider a nanny with their own child. We'll see - I guess I'll find out when I advertise. It's a bit early yet! Thanks again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...