Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nick Robinson (as much as it pains me to agree with tories I often find myself agreeing with him) summed it well on the bbc;


"The reason nothing much has been done is simple. Most independent reports into party funding recommend increased taxpayer support for politics combined with a cap on individual and trade union donations.


It's a recipe vetoed first by the opinion polls ("A granny tax to pay for election posters," anyone?) and secondly by the Conservative and Labour parties' fear that they will be unilaterally disarming themselves in the political funding arms race."

I wonder how much Cameron knew about what was going on. It was not as though Peter Cruddas was acting in his own self interest. I'd have expected Cameron's diary to be very busy and each appointments prioritised according to their importance.

Regardless of how much he knew (and I'm betting that it was plenty) the Sun is going to run and run with this and make sure this Tory government will be as tainted with sleaze as the last one (although this is much more of a new labour flavour of sleaze than your traditional tory variety, but I digress).

Murdoch didn't much like Cameron and was already quietly doing him down and praising Boris before the Leveson enquiry.

Expect a relentless attack with a huge helping of schadenfreude from Murdoch.

Oh, quite. You can expect that post-Levenson, Murdoch will be seeking to renew his powers over the political class (of all colours) in the UK. They've been getting a bit confident of late and not doing his bidding, so he'll be keen to slap them down and show them who's boss.

It is interesting times in judging how [post-leveson] emboldened politicians will really feel in the face of an onslaught from Murdoch's papers.

I'd love them to hold their nerve but my instincts tell me that politicians feel the precariousness of their political fortunes somewhat too keenly for that.


Does anyone remember the yes prime minister RPG on the old Spectrum? I seem to recall it really cast you in the role of doing everything in order to effect some positive press as your party got the knives out if your popularity rating fell below a threshold for too long.

It's probably as relevant today (as indeed was it's inspirational source material) as it ever was.


I wonder if it's out there on an emulator somewhere.


*ETA - for the bit-curious: http://www.hotud.org/component/content/article/46-simulation/22304*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis off licence Petition 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...