Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A planning application has just been lodged to put 3 more 6 meter high masts on top of Mundania Court (corner of Mundania Road and Forest Hill Road)


The existing building roof is approx 13m above ground. These, at 6.6m tall will be half as tall again. This height and their position tight against the side of the building and will loom over Mundania Road, Forest Hill Road and all the surrounding houses.


There are other reasons why you may well want to object to this development.


The application number is 19/AP/1195 and the case officer is Michael Gozo. You can see the (very poor quality) drawings on the Southwark Council Planning Database


If you want to comment on the proposals you can do so at the link below

https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9582775


Don't believe it if the page says there are no public comments.....there are, they just try not to publicize it.


If you do comment, I would be grateful if you could let me know either by commenting on this thread or by copying the confirmation email to me at [email protected]

It is for 5G.

My objection is the size and location on the masts, their visual impact on the surrounding neighbourhood and the adjacent listed church and their impact on the amenity of the residents of Mundania Court. We already have noise nuisance issues from the existing equipment (wind noise and mechanical noise from the air-con plant) and this will only increase it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    • It took the Tories 14 years to dig that 20bn blackhole. It's taken Labour 14 months to double it.  You cant get rid of Reeves though because the next person will actually be totally incompetent. There are no MPs in Labour capable of performing better than the current shower.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...