Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A certain amount of benign neglect creeps in


Child no 4 has to grapple with a particular variant on blw. He doesn't get regular snacks because the older ones don't, so he is reduced to dashing into the kitchen if the gate is left open, climbing up on to the stool to pinch fruit from the bowl, which he then does his best to peel by himself. (I will say that this hard hearted feeding strategy is very effective for avoiding fussiness, he scoffs anything you actually give to him)


Went to sainsburys to buy him some trousers today. He is 16m. The clothes he was wearing today were trousers aged 9-12m and fleece aged 3-6m (!)


Am I a terrible mother?


Are your later children wickedly deprived in comparison with the lavish treatment of no 1?!

I think it's the other way round in our house at the moment. Have had an Easter clear out of clothes, having had hubby point out that our eldest's clothes were looking a bit small. He's 5, most of the clothes he was wearing were size 2/3 :-$. I kind of forget that he's still growing, and having always been on the small side he suddenly seems to be having a growth spurt.


We went to get him new shoes last week, 1.5 sizes larger than the ones he's been wearing. Oops.


On the plus side we then had fun at Sainsburys today choosing him some new clothes after selling the old ones. With the added bonus of 25% off (and a recurrent pirate theme in their clothing range which he loved).


I'm planning on doing BLW with #3, mainly due to the fact that if she's not eating the same as the rest of us I will probably forget to feed her!

Child no 2 was poorly this morning after throwing up during the night and was lying feebly on the sofa. 'can I have some water please mummy?' he whispered bravely.


I broke off briefly from my washing folding frenzy, filled a cup of water and delivered it. Or so I thought. Moments after when I saw the baby, in his high chair, splashing happily. Had given the water to the wrong child.


Even the children call each other 'whatever your name is'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...