Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This morning my 2.5 son took of his trousers and his nappy off, put the nappy in the bin, pulled out his potty, did a wee, and then came to tell me about it (I was making breakfast and did not know what he was up to. He then told us that he wants to go to shop to get pants.


Taking the cue from him, today we went to the shop and let him choose some pants, and this afternoon he has had two accidents although the second one he did run to me telling me he had a wee but by the time we got to the bathroom it was too late.


So my questions are.


Clearly he is ready to be potty trained, but how do people manage:


1. For nursery. Do I put a nappy for nursery or do I keep him in pants and give them lots and lots of spare clothes?

2. Do I wait until he is going to the potty regularly at home before sending him out into the big wide world in only pants?

3. Once he is out and about in pants, how do you do if we are, for example, on the platform waiting for a train and he tells you he needs to go?


Any tips appreciated thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22992-advice-on-potty-training/
Share on other sites

With both of my older children we went into pants full time during the day from day 1 of potty training. Nurseries are used to it, so yes, just send lots of clothes and make sure they are aware that they need to keep an eye on him.


For out and about, take a potty with you. I kept one under the buggy - the Potette travel potty is excellent as it folds flat and uses little bags which you can then seal and throw away rather than having to find somewhere to empty it.


I was surprised at how quickly the initial phase passes - both of my kids (a boy and a girl) very quickly mastered it and we actually ended up having very few accidents. It helps if they are ready, which it sounds as if your little boy is.

definitely agree with Pickle. They will get muddled if they are in and out of nappies and pants depending on nursery days or not.


There will be accidents, particularly if they are having a lot of fun, and not remembering to tell you if they need the loo, but just take a travel potty and spare change when you go out, and if there is an accident, give them a hug, tell them not to worry, but to try to tell you next time.


Also boys do have an advantage of being able to pee in bushes.

That's great to know thanks. Some weeks ago he also showed signs of being ready - he would ask for a wee and do one in the potty, but after a few days he lost interest so we did not push it. I will persevere with the pants for a few days and see what happens - how long should I give it? For example, could today have just been a fluke? (last time we thought he was ready but clearly after a few days he lost interest). Are there any bribes I could use to keep his interest?
I agree with the straight to pants except that if we had a car journey I put pull ups on and called them 'travel pants' as really didn't want to have to deal with sopping car seat and long journey! Never caused any confusion. Think prob also used them in the supermarket in v early stages. Asked my nanny what he did at the park if little B needed a wee and was initially horrified by 'he goes in a bush' but it is so much easier with boys, you can just go in any vegitation if a real emergency...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...