Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I am a new mum who will be returning to work in September when my son will be 7 months old. I'm currently looking for childcare but am finding it all a bit expensive. I was wondering if anybody else felt the same and wanted to do a child care exchange, where I looked after your little one for one or two days a week in exchange for you looking after my little boy.


I will be working Wednesday, Thursday and Friday and my mum will hopefully be looking after him for one of these days. I'm a primary school teacher specialising in the early years so am CRB checked and have plenty of experience of working with little ones.


Has anyone heard of schemes like this or would be interested? I've checked with OFSTED that this is Ok, and as long as no money is exchanged, then it is all above board.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23345-child-care-exchange/
Share on other sites

In the good old days (i.e. when I was a child) my mum and her friends did this all the time. I think now there are more stringent rules about being registered etc, but if you are CRB checked, then you might be OK.


I would say that the only drawback is that it sounds a nice idea, but you could often be let down by the other person, when it is an arrangement like this, rather than one where money is exchanged, and when there is an obligation.

One of the girls from my anti-natal group who is a lawyer is looking into the legalities, but I believe that idea that people couldn't exchange child care was dropped after Ed Balls intervened and OFSTED changed their policy. It was absolutely ludicrous that those two ladies were prosecuted in the first place!

Yes, I read the Ed Balls interview some time ago. My understanding was that he concluded that prohibition on childcare exchange was not in the spirit in which the childcare laws were written, and that prohibiting such exchange in itself had no legal grounds.


The excerpts in Fuschia's BBC article say it very succintly:

Inspectors should not interfere in private arrangements between friends looking after each other's children, says Children's Secretary Ed Balls.


This follows the case of policewomen who were told that helping each other with babysitting was illegal if they were not registered.


Mr Balls has written to England's inspectorate, Ofsted, to say this is not the intention of childcare law.


Such arrangements "should not be a matter for regulation," he says.


Speaking in the House of Commons, the children's secretary told MPs that he had written to Ofsted chief, Christine Gilbert, to clarify the rules on informal arrangements for looking after children.



Mr Balls said he wanted "to make clear that reciprocal childcare arrangements between parents where there is no payment involved should not be a matter for regulation".


"I have agreed today with Ofsted that with immediate effect, this will be beyond the scope of their childcare inspections and will make this crystal clear by changing the regulations in the coming period."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A shout out for Mark, owner of Pure Plumbers. 07970 971510 They're well established in the Sevenoaks area, but have recently started doing more work in SE London.  Did some v quick and efficient bathroom and boiler fixes for me; have also seen some of the bathrooms he's built, which have a nice attention to detail. Jessica    
    • Totally agree regarding not supporting chains. Gail’s was fine but last time I went in Feb this year, actually walked out Fayetteville looking at menu and waiting 15 minutes to even get glass of water and not busy at all. Staff gone down hill - sooner it goes the better… Always prefer to support non chains - so many lovely places with good food to choose from with pleasant staff who know about customer service and sadly, non English which says a lot for our culture, pubs are also becoming abit of a hit and miss affair but maybe just unlucky. At the end of the day all about the chef. Still abit unclear where new place is located - is it down the road from Goose Green where parade of shops are before Peckham Rye?  
    • Surely only where the local businesses offer clear advantages, otherwise you are rewarding what should be failure. I want to be served by a better bakery than Gail's, not a worse but local independent one. Certainly give a local independent some time to get the offer right, but don't buy goods which are worse and or more expensive just because the outlet isn't a chain. 
    • Let’s just boycott all chains in favour of local businesses.  Places like Gail’s popping up everywhere has a very damaging impact on small businesses. It’s just the same as the new empanadas place but on a bigger scale. I’ll say it a million times more, we hold the power with our choices. Let’s use our power to look after ourselves and our environment (which includes small local family businesses). And yes, I also love Chacarero.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...