Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I am a new mum who will be returning to work in September when my son will be 7 months old. I'm currently looking for childcare but am finding it all a bit expensive. I was wondering if anybody else felt the same and wanted to do a child care exchange, where I looked after your little one for one or two days a week in exchange for you looking after my little boy.


I will be working Wednesday, Thursday and Friday and my mum will hopefully be looking after him for one of these days. I'm a primary school teacher specialising in the early years so am CRB checked and have plenty of experience of working with little ones.


Has anyone heard of schemes like this or would be interested? I've checked with OFSTED that this is Ok, and as long as no money is exchanged, then it is all above board.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23345-child-care-exchange/
Share on other sites

In the good old days (i.e. when I was a child) my mum and her friends did this all the time. I think now there are more stringent rules about being registered etc, but if you are CRB checked, then you might be OK.


I would say that the only drawback is that it sounds a nice idea, but you could often be let down by the other person, when it is an arrangement like this, rather than one where money is exchanged, and when there is an obligation.

One of the girls from my anti-natal group who is a lawyer is looking into the legalities, but I believe that idea that people couldn't exchange child care was dropped after Ed Balls intervened and OFSTED changed their policy. It was absolutely ludicrous that those two ladies were prosecuted in the first place!

Yes, I read the Ed Balls interview some time ago. My understanding was that he concluded that prohibition on childcare exchange was not in the spirit in which the childcare laws were written, and that prohibiting such exchange in itself had no legal grounds.


The excerpts in Fuschia's BBC article say it very succintly:

Inspectors should not interfere in private arrangements between friends looking after each other's children, says Children's Secretary Ed Balls.


This follows the case of policewomen who were told that helping each other with babysitting was illegal if they were not registered.


Mr Balls has written to England's inspectorate, Ofsted, to say this is not the intention of childcare law.


Such arrangements "should not be a matter for regulation," he says.


Speaking in the House of Commons, the children's secretary told MPs that he had written to Ofsted chief, Christine Gilbert, to clarify the rules on informal arrangements for looking after children.



Mr Balls said he wanted "to make clear that reciprocal childcare arrangements between parents where there is no payment involved should not be a matter for regulation".


"I have agreed today with Ofsted that with immediate effect, this will be beyond the scope of their childcare inspections and will make this crystal clear by changing the regulations in the coming period."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't want to name a shop, but I have twice at this busy time of year had an issue, and yesterday was overcharged when buying a number of small things. If you are using a shop which doesn't give an itemised receipt, or doesn't give a receipt at all, just be aware that it might be a good idea to check that you are not paying over the odds (and if using cash, that you are given the right change for what you handed over). When staff are busy they might make mistakes.
    • As I had a moan on here about the truly abysmal Christmas meal we had at The Cherry Tree last year, I am redressing the balance by saying we had a really excellent Christmas meal at Franklins last night. Every course was absolutely delicious and  really well cooked. The staff were lovely despite being exhausted and run off their feet. In particular, my sea bass was a large portion and cooked to perfection, in stark contrast to the small dried up portion The Cherry Tree provided, from which I was barely able to scrape a teaspoonful of flesh (that is not an exaggeration). And our Franklins meal cost less than half what we paid at The Cherry Tree (to be fair, that was on Christmas Day so the Cherry Tree costs would have been higher, but that doesn't excuse the appalling quality meal). Thank you again to Franklins for restoring our faith in eating out at Christmas! 
    • That is almost too ridiculous to answer but I'll take the bait. You are comparing a national charity with one branch of a small charity. Cats Protection has around 34 dedicated rehoming centres. CHAT has two, Lewisham & Canning Town and a sanctuary in Sussex. So if Cats Protection have homed 34,000 cats, thats an average of 1000 per branch. From memory this years total so far for Lewisham CHAT was over 980. I saw a few homed this weekend so we may well reach 1000 for this year. The same as Cats Protection. No need for head scratching.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...