Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I am a new mum who will be returning to work in September when my son will be 7 months old. I'm currently looking for childcare but am finding it all a bit expensive. I was wondering if anybody else felt the same and wanted to do a child care exchange, where I looked after your little one for one or two days a week in exchange for you looking after my little boy.


I will be working Wednesday, Thursday and Friday and my mum will hopefully be looking after him for one of these days. I'm a primary school teacher specialising in the early years so am CRB checked and have plenty of experience of working with little ones.


Has anyone heard of schemes like this or would be interested? I've checked with OFSTED that this is Ok, and as long as no money is exchanged, then it is all above board.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23345-child-care-exchange/
Share on other sites

In the good old days (i.e. when I was a child) my mum and her friends did this all the time. I think now there are more stringent rules about being registered etc, but if you are CRB checked, then you might be OK.


I would say that the only drawback is that it sounds a nice idea, but you could often be let down by the other person, when it is an arrangement like this, rather than one where money is exchanged, and when there is an obligation.

One of the girls from my anti-natal group who is a lawyer is looking into the legalities, but I believe that idea that people couldn't exchange child care was dropped after Ed Balls intervened and OFSTED changed their policy. It was absolutely ludicrous that those two ladies were prosecuted in the first place!

Yes, I read the Ed Balls interview some time ago. My understanding was that he concluded that prohibition on childcare exchange was not in the spirit in which the childcare laws were written, and that prohibiting such exchange in itself had no legal grounds.


The excerpts in Fuschia's BBC article say it very succintly:

Inspectors should not interfere in private arrangements between friends looking after each other's children, says Children's Secretary Ed Balls.


This follows the case of policewomen who were told that helping each other with babysitting was illegal if they were not registered.


Mr Balls has written to England's inspectorate, Ofsted, to say this is not the intention of childcare law.


Such arrangements "should not be a matter for regulation," he says.


Speaking in the House of Commons, the children's secretary told MPs that he had written to Ofsted chief, Christine Gilbert, to clarify the rules on informal arrangements for looking after children.



Mr Balls said he wanted "to make clear that reciprocal childcare arrangements between parents where there is no payment involved should not be a matter for regulation".


"I have agreed today with Ofsted that with immediate effect, this will be beyond the scope of their childcare inspections and will make this crystal clear by changing the regulations in the coming period."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
    • Hi - I’m looking for bean bags, cushions, toys and games for our play therapist who works weekly with some of our children. Any donations like board games, cuddly toys, dolls houses, action figures, dolls, puppets, easel etc would be very welcome. For Rushey Green Primary School
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...