Jump to content

Recommended Posts

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/parliament-suspension-hundreds-of-thousands-expected-at-disruptive-protests-over-prorogation-move-a4225421.html


Stop The Coup, defend democracy - protest at Downing Street

Tomorrow, 12:00 ? 14:00

SW1A 2AT

London


Parliament Returns. We protest. #RejectBrexit

Tue, 08:30 ? 23:30

Palace of Westminster

London

Always honest Lou


Usually wrong


Why would these protests drive you away? An unelected prime minister is taking us towards a no deal Brexit which is the opposite of that which was promised - it?s entirely appropriate to talk about democracy, the abuse of etc

I've lost count of the number of times Brexiters have used the veiled threat that there would be civil unrest if Brexit wasn't delivered. Whereas Remainers have demonstrated peacefully in their hundreds of thousands their opposition to Brexit and now the clear undermining of our democratic system by proroguing Parliament. We've got an unelected tinpot dictator telling Tory MPs that if they vote against No Deal they will automatically be deselected by Tory Central Office. Wake up Lou, this is how fascism creeps up, it never arrives in jackboots...

Have you thought that Boris is playing a double bluff with the EU, but potentially the UK could leave as the majority at the time voted to leave the EU.


Next, you'll be calling for a General Strike on 31st October.


Referring to Nazi Germany causes offence, do you really need to introduce that?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Always honest Lou

>

> Usually wrong

>

> Why would these protests drive you away? An

> unelected prime minister is taking us towards a no

> deal Brexit which is the opposite of that which

> was promised - it?s entirely appropriate to talk

> about democracy, the abuse of etc


Gordon Brown wasn't elected and he got Milliband to sig the Lisbon treaty...https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/the-eu-lisbon-treaty-gordon-brown-surrenders-britains-sovereignty

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's still not a reference to Nazi Germany. Keep

> trying...

Sadiq has done it for you

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/world-war-two-sadiq-khan-donald-trump-forgetting-lessons/


what an embarrassment he is turning out to be

Hitler wanted a united Europe under HIS Command.

He basically invented th E.U. but was defeated.


The E.U. was formed in an attempt to prevent conflict between its members from ever happening again.

Thats what we were all told. It was more of a financial set up for which the U.K. were not really part off.


The member countries adopted the Euro as their currency. The UK kept the Pound.


Why do you think Brussels allowed us to do that ??


It meant we were Never really part of the E.U. in the Financial sector. and were subject to an exchange rate.


That's a big area were The UK lost out and have continued to do so.


Fox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hitler wanted a united Europe under HIS Command.

> He basically invented th E.U. but was defeated.

>

> The E.U. was formed in an attempt to prevent

> conflict between its members from ever happening

> again.

> Thats what we were all told. It was more of a

> financial set up for which the U.K. were not

> really part off.

>

> The member countries adopted the Euro as their

> currency. The UK kept the Pound.

>

> Why do you think Brussels allowed us to do that

> ??

>

> It meant we were Never really part of the E.U. in

> the Financial sector. and were subject to an

> exchange rate.

>

> That's a big area were The UK lost out and have

> continued to do so.

>

> Fox


Financial services is an area where we are already losing out as a result of a leave vote


But as usual you?re happy to spout rubbish that has no basis in reality


?Hitler invented the EU?! WTF!

With respect, foxy has a valid point. The rise of Hitler was a second attempt by the German state, under a dictator, to take over Europe and unite it under the Third Reich. It began with the annexation of ?German speaking? regions of various neighbouring countries throughout the 1930?s and ended with them eyeing up the Soviet Union.


The EU has done a lot of good things for Europe, but it has also done a lot of not so good things. It?s treatment of Greece for one, is a shameful stain on its reputation. I think we should remain, but not because I absolutely love this capitalist loving institution for wealthy unelected elites, but because I am a pragmatist who thinks we are so badly entangled within its structure we could potentially cause a lot of immediate and possibly long lasting damage to our economy.


However, all these remain marches and two fingers at democracy make me feel very uneasy. As I?m sure they do a lot of people.


Louisa.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Always honest Lou

>

> Usually wrong

>

> Why would these protests drive you away? An

> unelected prime minister is taking us towards a no

> deal Brexit which is the opposite of that which

> was promised - it?s entirely appropriate to talk

> about democracy, the abuse of etc


Prime Ministers in the U.K. are not elected as such, never have been. The party has the privilege of crowning them such. Not sure why that is always thrown up as a justification for anything people don?t agree with a government doing.


Parliament could have walked away with May?s deal three times and chose not to. This could all be done and dusted by now. The fact is, most remainers won?t be happy until we get a second referendum in which everyone decides to vote remain. It?s not going to happen. And let?s say people voted to leave again, would you remainers accept the result? Or would you want a further referendum? Maybe the question could be ?are you really really sure you want to leave??


The whole thing is getting ridiculous!


Louisa.

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With respect, foxy has a valid point. The rise of

> Hitler was a second attempt by the German state,

> under a dictator, to take over Europe and unite it

> under the Third Reich. It began with the

> annexation of ?German speaking? regions of various

> neighbouring countries throughout the 1930?s and

> ended with them eyeing up the Soviet Union.

>

with respect, suggesting hitler invented the EU is ridiculous

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loutwo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > With respect, foxy has a valid point. The rise

> of

> > Hitler was a second attempt by the German

> state,

> > under a dictator, to take over Europe and unite

> it

> > under the Third Reich. It began with the

> > annexation of ?German speaking? regions of

> various

> > neighbouring countries throughout the 1930?s

> and

> > ended with them eyeing up the Soviet Union.

> >

> with respect, suggesting hitler invented the EU is

> ridiculous


With respect, if we had not had Hitler, we would not have needed the EU. The Second World War lead to European nations seeking a way of uniting nations under a umbrella organisation to prevent dictatorships such as the nazi regime. Without Hitler and his tyranny, the EU would never have happened.


Louisa.

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loutwo Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > With respect, foxy has a valid point. The

> rise

> > of

> > > Hitler was a second attempt by the German

> > state,

> > > under a dictator, to take over Europe and

> unite

> > it

> > > under the Third Reich. It began with the

> > > annexation of ?German speaking? regions of

> > various

> > > neighbouring countries throughout the 1930?s

> > and

> > > ended with them eyeing up the Soviet Union.

> > >

> > with respect, suggesting hitler invented the EU

> is

> > ridiculous

>

> With respect, if we had not had Hitler, we would

> not have needed the EU. The Second World War lead

> to European nations seeking a way of uniting

> nations under a umbrella organisation to prevent

> dictatorships such as the nazi regime. Without

> Hitler and his tyranny, the EU would never have

> happened.

>

> Louisa.


Hitler didn?t invent war or empire building or international trade you know


But even if he had it wouldn?t mean that he invented the EU

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...