Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Loved reading the responses, thanks all.


A few questions though -


Alan - why would you burn all your clothes?

Tom - never gone commando?

Ted - Diane by any chance? Loving your work as ever.

BNG - do you have a twirly bow-tie and flower that squirts water to go with those?


PS maxxi - I think 'rayon' has been rebranded as eco-something or other.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You didn't have to confess glasses Ms.B as they

> are not really clothing. Now you haven't yet

> mentioned comfortable underwear so perhaps focus

> on that instead.


Interestingly, after a certain age it's uncomfortably restrictive underwear that's most comfortable as once you're actually in it you don't have to hold anything in any more. But someone already said Spanx.


I think Sandi Toksvig said that once of the best things about reaching 50 was letting yourself wear big knickers again and not caring what anyone else thought.

>

> Interestingly, after a certain age it's

> uncomfortably restrictive underwear that's most

> comfortable as once you're actually in it you

> don't have to hold anything in any more. But

> someone already said Spanx.

>


I did and I wore them today under my new dress. My stomach was as flat as a pancake all day..until I took them off :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...