Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting last few posts. Maybe worthwhile a new thread asking these questions specifically.

The reason I say that is that there must be many people who have gone through the same logic. We certainly did. We have dismissed ED as a place to put more money into as it is ridiculously dear per s foot, its transport links are not very good for the place in Western Europe where most wealth is created (city and cw) and there are so few houses on the market that they command tremendous premia, simply for being "for sale".


So we started to look at the ELL on the basis that there is more upside (lower starting prices we know and higher ending ones we think). We worked our way down it.

New cross - on the up, houses often small, some v nice new developments on Telegraph hill

Brockley - seems to split into Hilly Fields park area and "the rest of it". HFP - big gap in size between gorgeous huge impressive flats and the big houses with some in between. The "rest of it" has a lot of four bed, ED style terraces. Per sq foot all of it is still very cheap. Lots of new businesses opening. Leisure centre coming. Local blog but not very chatty. Girls school.

HOP - north side of station not as nice as south. Prices lower to reflect this. High street has potential bu we waited 45 mins for some coffee and my husband could not take that. I liked it though. No Really big houses but nice Edwardian terraces. Cheaper than ED and many of the houses are bigger.

Forest hill - loved some of the bigger non terraced houses but either cld not afford or decided the re doing and subsequent upkeep would kill us. Also thought the roads system weird and not sure where the centre is or where the development is happening. New leisure centre coming.

Sydenham - loved again the big non terraced houses, started to feel a bit suburban. Girls school but not sure where boys go.


I guess it depends what you are looking for.... Space and garden are important to us but friends have a cottage in Dorset so they don't mind being less "free" during the week.

  • 6 months later...

This website has just been written about in today's Sunday Times. Seems like it could be quite helpful to those who are moving away from ED and London. Clever idea. Basically people log in and can ask any question i.e. about schools, houses etc about any area and people local to that area will answer.


http://lifeafterlondon.com/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's called The Restorative Place. Also, the Fired Earth storefront is under offer too, apparently. How exciting...!
    • Perhaps the view is that there are fewer people needing social housing in London, going forward, or to cap it as it is rather than increasing it. We already see the demographic changing.
    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...