Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Message to East Dulwich Business Owners / Managers.


The use of forecourts is about to rear its ugly head again as Southwark attempts to raise revenue from the anticipated greater footfall north of the borough during the summer Olympics. This will of course impact on businesses south of the borough.


Some of you will remember around Christmas the ugly scenes when council reps visited stores and bars demanding licence applications, these reps were unaware of the council policy and what they said varied from one business to another. Many traders were left distraught and confused by the bullish behaviour and the council reps' ignorance of their own policy. We are hoping they will be politer and better informed this time.


In essence, if you do have furniture on the public highway INCLUDING 'A' BOARDS it is very likely that you will have to pay a (increased) licence fee (to see the report follow this url http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgIssueHistoryHome.aspx?IId=20531&Opt=0).


If you have furniture on your own privately owned land / forecourt (the vast case in and around East Dulwich) you are exempt from the license IF you have a boundary fence OR display a sign stating;


'THIS IS A PRIVATE FORECOURT FOR THE USE OF CUSTOMERS / PATRONS ONLY.'


Southwark Council would not be happy with the fence options as it will mean a reduction in the width of the pavements, however this is an option which you can consider and might give you some leverage. Also the fees appear to be levied on the size and number of items which means a small cafe busy at just lunchtimes could be paying the same as a huge SE1 bar. Typically the policy has not been thought through.


It is disturbing to us members of the business community when all the media's attention is focused on preserving and promoting small businesses to help preserve our high streets, Southwark Council is ignoring the 'Portas Protocol' and penalising the very people who make this borough such a vibrant and desirable one.


If the visiting Southwark reps are ignorant of the policy, or in any way bullish, remain calm, do nothing, take their name and contact us; we will talk to your Local Councillor, The Cabinet Member For Transport, Environment and Recycling and the Head of Public Realm's office. If the Southwark reps behave as badly as they did last time then we shall be taking the matter to the press and advising our MP, but we need incident reports so write everything down and try to get any conversations witnessed IE when they arrive make sure you have another member of staff or an obliging member of the public on hand.


If you have furniture on the highway and you want to fight this decision please email us back and we will form a group to do so. We have already had the offer of support in doing this. Contact the South Southwark Business Association by email at [email protected]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I suppose all these issues that need addressing are a reflection of the times we live in. Important and necessary but somehow destroy the underlying spirit.
    • Do you know who organised and ran it? Because it must have been quite a lot of work. Who kept track of the credits? What safeguards were they? Was there a lower age limit eg over 18? Was insurance needed? ID? Who checked it? What was the situation if somebody was injured while working in your house or garden? What if someone broke or stole something? What if someone in your house was molested or attacked? What if you weren't happy with the standard of work? Sorry to be gloomy, but whilst this sounds a great idea in theory, in common with many people I know I've had several  bad experiences with supposedly professional tradespeople, let alone someone who wasn't doing it for a living.
    • I think the Brixton Pound lives on, so there must be some kind of appetite for it, but I'm afraid I doubt it would be very useful for me.
    • My primary issue is the noise level and the fact that it begins at dusk and continues well into the early hours, the odd random bang being possibly the worst aspect as you never know when the next volley will occur. This is no longer about celebrating a turning point as the clock strikes 12am, but more a lengthy indulgence in ear shattering bangs, where there also seems to be competition as to who can create the loudest most startling barrage of sustained noise. A new thing is daytime fireworks, where buyers are urged to forget the visual aspect and focus on getting the biggest bang for their buck. I am lucky as I am not super sensitive to noise but I really feel for those who are. As for pets, I am afraid there are now many that require serious medication to get them through- and those meds are not cheap. The fault here is not with the animals or people sensitive to extreme bangs, but with those who insist on their right to impose it on all around them, not just for half an hour a few times a year, but for hours on customary dates and now  spreading to random events throughout the year.I  New Year fireworks is a very recent construct, and now Halloween Fireworks are becoming a thing. Why should we encourage and condone a proliferating societal noise addiction? It really is isn't healthy. Let those who wish to damage their eardrums enjoy their pastime through headphones; they can turn the volume up as high as they like.  If last night was the end of it then that is great but I think there'll be more through the weekend and more discarded jumbo firework boxes dumped in the park. I hope we follow other countries in adopting low noise fireworks and drone shows instead.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...