Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Peckham Vision http://www.peckhamvision.org has a lot of experience of how local action can affect what happens in our neighbourhood. We are keen to share this in conversation with others locally. Regularly we do that on Saturday afternoons in our small shop unit in Holdrons Arcade, and at summer events. Also we open our studio in the Bussey Building sometimes for this. One opportunity is this weekend.


To anyone who is free in Peckham this weekend, Peckham Vision invite you to our Open Studio. Open from midday to 5pm, Saturday and Sunday, 7th & 8th December, next to the Pexmas market and the Bussey Winter fair in Copeland Gallery, Copeland Park. The entrance is through 133 Rye Lane. The studio is on 2nd floor on Stair C, yellow door in the Bussey passage.


Come for a chat and find out about how community action saved the Bussey Building, Copeland Park, Peckham Multi-Storey and much more. Also how all this relates directly to the climate emergency. Post your comments here on any of these topics after your visit. It woud be good to see a discussion here.

  • 1 month later...

PECKHAM VISION AND A HISTORY OF COPELAND PARK & BUSSEY BUILDING - https://www.copelandpark.com/blog/2020/01/15/peckham-vision-and-a-history-of-copeland-park/

Come and learn more - at Peckham Vision?s next Community Open Studio this Sunday midday 12-5pm 19th January @ Bussey Passage, yellow door, 2nd floor. Tea & homemade cakes, exhibition & conversations. Topic of the moment: ?Climate Emergency and Extinction Rebellion in Southwark?. Also discover how Rye Lane has changed in the last 10 years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...