Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Women.

>

> Equivalent of ladies is gentlemen. Equivalent of

> men is women.

>

> Dear god, it's like the letters page of the

> Telegraph in here.


A 'soothing' contribution from today's ST letters page...


SIR - Who could doubt that women's tennis is more entertaining than men's tennis? Each game is so brief, so my attention does not wander. In men's matches the ball is hammered across the net in such a way that I cannot relax.

Derek Slavin,

Heywood, Lancashire. ;-)

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah, we're being fair are we.

>

> Ok then, in that case, we should make Usain Bolt earn his money by running for as long as, say,

> Tiger Woods plays golf?

>

> Or women footballers earn as much as men footballers - after all, they're on the pitch the

> same length of time...


Or maybe just get rid of the gender divide and just have a single competition? That would solve the argument instantly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello.   Thanks Nigel and Hparker 😀   I've got new slots available for new students looking for a piano teacher or guitar teacher.   You could start in the new term beginning September, or I'm also available adhoc-styles through the summer holidays at times.   I teach all ages, in most styles, in lots of different ways according to how you learn/like to learn.   Give me a call or text on 07730 402336.   I have connections to lots of performance opportunities/networks too.   I run regular events /student concerts, and play in bands/perform.   Natalie. 
    • So do I, but I think they are in trouble as well.  Anyway, that space wouldn't be big enough.
    • I'm not talking about Starmer. I was responding to a post which  said that  Corbyn was unelectable. How people voted in the "more hotly contested election" is irrelevant. Corbyn wasn't leading the Labour Party then. Starmer was. And the turnout for Labour reflects that. 
    • Reeves says she's in charge and no no's Rayners plan, what happens now?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...