Jump to content

social cycle ride Dulwich to Streatham Common Feb 1st starts 10am


Sally Eva

Recommended Posts

This is possible, I'm told. The ride lasts two hours (back at 12) and is "undulating" but not fast. The planning team spent time poring over the contour maps to work out the flattest route. It's not perhaps entirely flat, I'm told that "a bit hilly" is a reasonable description but it works. The ride starts and ends at the Dulwich Clock Cafe, Dulwich Park (SE21 7BQ) so there may be a bit of "up" to start with, depending on where you start from.


The carefully planned route is mostly on quiet backstreets. Riders go out through Tulse Hill and along Valley Road to Streatham, then round the west of the Common and up to Rookery Cafe. If all is going well, there should be time for a short coffee break before returning up through the Common to Leigham Court Road and quiet streets to Norwood Park. There will be a slight detour to criss-cross the park, then down Gypsy Road, the Paxton Green roundabout, and Alleyn Park Road, back to the start. The route is here:



This series of Saturday morning rides is organised by Bruce Lynn and friends on behalf of Southwark Cyclists. Our website is here: https://southwarkcyclists.org.uk. We are the borough branch of the London Cycling Campaign and their website is here: https://lcc.org.uk. You can contact us on [email protected]; tweet us @southwarkcycle or text Bruce on 07729 279 945. Or better still, just turn up. Everything we do is free and open to all. Welcome aboard.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Dunstans Road  comes under Dulwich Hill SNT- you can get their details on the Met Police website . I know that the Police are often patrolling Dawson Hights. Please contact them,
    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you, assuming of course, that they're driving with due care and attention. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark now (obviously no excuse).
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...