Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Seabag, don't you realise the baby was probably

> ordered by Cummings? It's the sort of announcement

> that can be kept up the sleeve for a good while,

> to be used to deflect attention from other

> 'negative' stories. Perfect weekend for it.


The sprog is also due to be dropped in early summer, which just happens to be around the time of the No Deal deadline. Still, look on the positive side, it makes a change for him to publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies up the duff...

> The sprog is also due to be dropped in early

> summer, which just happens to be around the time

> of the No Deal deadline. Still, look on the

> positive side, it makes a change for him to

> publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies

> up the duff...


There was a rumour that he hid away for a couple of weeks due to having a black eye. Maybe he had no option but to announce it. Remember Camberwellgate?

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Still, look on the

> positive side, it makes a change for him to

> publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies

> up the duff...



There is no positive side. There will soon be another person in the world who has half BJ's genes.

Cynicism aside, it?s a new life in the world and Ms Symonds deserves to have her pregnancy respected.


But Boris hasn?t the greatest rep regarding his record for sticking in there as a parent, but this time might be different.


Plus he?s 55 now, so maybe he?s matured enough to see this one through.


Maybe maybe

I was thinking, maybe Prince Andrew might announce he?s pregnant


I know it?s a long shot, but this with a bit of airbrushing of his past could turn his life around. Add to that a cover on HELLO WTF magazine, with Andy and his new baby bump.


A few years ago it?d be a ludicrous idea, but it could work now in this day and age of diversity and tolerance.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a rumour that he hid away for a couple

> of weeks due to having a black eye. Maybe he had

> no option but to announce it. Remember

> Camberwellgate?


Another that he was paid an advance on a book that needed to be written soon.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dbboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > She's 31, nearly half his age, what was she

> ever

> > thinking when she let him shaft her??

>

> Oh don?t, this news item is making me nauseous

> enough already.


It's even made the Daily Mail nauseous


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8063043/STEPHEN-GLOVER-pray-end-Boris-bounder.html

It's the new normal. This would have ruined a political career in the recent past. Now lies and personal life the response from many is "well that just shows what a normal person he is". Maybe it's some perverse thing that the media normally needs to find this stuff out, but as he has made it easy then the reaction is very different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...