Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Seabag, don't you realise the baby was probably

> ordered by Cummings? It's the sort of announcement

> that can be kept up the sleeve for a good while,

> to be used to deflect attention from other

> 'negative' stories. Perfect weekend for it.


The sprog is also due to be dropped in early summer, which just happens to be around the time of the No Deal deadline. Still, look on the positive side, it makes a change for him to publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies up the duff...

> The sprog is also due to be dropped in early

> summer, which just happens to be around the time

> of the No Deal deadline. Still, look on the

> positive side, it makes a change for him to

> publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies

> up the duff...


There was a rumour that he hid away for a couple of weeks due to having a black eye. Maybe he had no option but to announce it. Remember Camberwellgate?

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Still, look on the

> positive side, it makes a change for him to

> publicly acknowledge he's got one of his floozies

> up the duff...



There is no positive side. There will soon be another person in the world who has half BJ's genes.

Cynicism aside, it?s a new life in the world and Ms Symonds deserves to have her pregnancy respected.


But Boris hasn?t the greatest rep regarding his record for sticking in there as a parent, but this time might be different.


Plus he?s 55 now, so maybe he?s matured enough to see this one through.


Maybe maybe

I was thinking, maybe Prince Andrew might announce he?s pregnant


I know it?s a long shot, but this with a bit of airbrushing of his past could turn his life around. Add to that a cover on HELLO WTF magazine, with Andy and his new baby bump.


A few years ago it?d be a ludicrous idea, but it could work now in this day and age of diversity and tolerance.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a rumour that he hid away for a couple

> of weeks due to having a black eye. Maybe he had

> no option but to announce it. Remember

> Camberwellgate?


Another that he was paid an advance on a book that needed to be written soon.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dbboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > She's 31, nearly half his age, what was she

> ever

> > thinking when she let him shaft her??

>

> Oh don?t, this news item is making me nauseous

> enough already.


It's even made the Daily Mail nauseous


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8063043/STEPHEN-GLOVER-pray-end-Boris-bounder.html

It's the new normal. This would have ruined a political career in the recent past. Now lies and personal life the response from many is "well that just shows what a normal person he is". Maybe it's some perverse thing that the media normally needs to find this stuff out, but as he has made it easy then the reaction is very different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...