Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> India, as pointed out above, has huge problems

> with real poverty. But at the same time it is a

> country that is developing successfully.


Again I think that's debatable. The burgeoning Indian middle class loves to give that impression, but so did the British middle class in the mid-1800s, amidst grinding poverty in both countryside and town...

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Enriching the Indian middle class is

> > probably not useful to the poor.

>

> I thought they had tax in India too. Is this not

> the case?


Of course, but I bet they don't spend much of it on the poor - the infrastructure situation in India is so chronic that even the middle class won't get much richer until they spend serious money on it.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Enriching the Indian middle class is

> > probably not useful to the poor.

>

> I thought they had tax in India too. Is this not

> the case?


As this country has shown, the gulf between rich and poor have got wider despite reforms to the taxation system since the days of Thatcher.

Beer in The Evening? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Er, so? Opium was a widely-sought commodity in the

> 19th century. Not forgetting that its trade was

> perfectly legal, and any profit made from it.

> Should we seek indemnity from the Wright brothers'

> descendents, seeing as their ancestors' creation

> has lead to so much pollution?


Next you'll be saying that slavery wasn't wrong because it was legal at the time. Sorry I don't accept your point.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Beer in The Evening? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Er, so? Opium was a widely-sought commodity in

> the

> > 19th century. Not forgetting that its trade was

> > perfectly legal, and any profit made from it.

> > Should we seek indemnity from the Wright

> brothers'

> > descendents, seeing as their ancestors'

> creation

> > has lead to so much pollution?

>

> Next you'll be saying that slavery wasn't wrong

> because it was legal at the time. Sorry I don't

> accept your point.


No, the point is that we're no longer reponsible for that wrong

Not to mention it wasn't perfectly legal.

The Chinese authorities specifically banned us from selling it, so we killed lots of their folk, blew shit up and forced a one sided humiliating treaty on them allowing us to sell them opium and ravage their society with destructive addiction as long as we stopped killing them and blowing shit up.

I suppose you could call that technically legal, it I think a modern court might deem that coercion.

Anyway, the whole historical responsibility thing aside, surely the crux is that we generally alleviate want and poverty specifically where the government does neglect its responsibility.


I'm sure there were many BITE types in the mid 80s farting on about how it wasnt our responsibility to do anything when Ethiopia had among the highest military spend as a proportion of GDP in the world.


Technically they may well have been right but they'd have also been cunts.

Nothings different if you ask me.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway, the whole historical responsibility thing

> aside, surely the crux is that we generally

> alleviate want and poverty specifically where the

> government does neglect its responsibility.

>

> I'm sure there were many BITE types in the mid 80s

> farting on about how it wasnt our responsibility

> to do anything when Ethiopia had among the highest

> military spend as a proportion of GDP in the

> world.

>

> Technically they may well have been right but

> they'd have also been @#$%&.

> Nothings different if you ask me.


But aid to India today isn't equivalent to emergency relief to Ethiopia in the 80s. Aid is phenomenally complex in its effects - and appeals to people's kindness doesn't make it less complex.

I think a more cynical approach to Indian aid would be to describe it as enlightened self interest.


Sometimes we 'give' a little because we get so much more in return.


If you don't think that retaining political influence and trade relations in the second largest nation in the world is in Britain's best interest then you're a little bit dumb.


India is the UK's biggest export market outside of the EU (yes bigger than the US), with around $30 billion dollars a year. The aim is to make this $60 billion dollars a year within 3 years. India is the biggest external investor in the UK even compared with the EU.


UK aid to India is a piss in the ocean compared with this, and to be honest marketing costs at a fraction of 1% of the overall income would be celebrated by every CEO in the world.


The newspapers are simply trying to sell copies, and appealing to simplistic thickos is a pretty good way of doing this.


But small brained right wing pillocks don't get any of this. They just go 'space travellers don't need poverty reduction'. Mainly because they haven't thought it through.


There is a substantial number of Indian MPs who want British aid to India to stop. If it was just free money they wouldn't care. They care because with that cash comes influence and conditions.


If you don't understand that then go back to criticising your neighbours.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...