Jump to content

For Sale: Hamax Rear Frame Childseat for Bikes


cel442

Recommended Posts

Really comfortable for children up to the age of around five. It's height adjustable, they have somewhere to put their feet (with straps to avoid dangling) and there's a comfortable and secure seatbelt. (Note: it does not recline as per the more recent version, but that has never stopped my daughter sleeping.)


It easily clicks in and out of a bracket on the rear of the main frame of the bike. You simply remove it when not in use, and it doesn't get in the way of a rear rack if you have one for your commute.


We have had many hours of happy riding, and have simply grown out of it with a tall 5 1/2 year old. We will miss it now we cannot take the children many other places!


Retails around ?150. Pickup from Melbourne Grove for ?75. Happy to do contactless pickup and payment via PayPal.

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...