Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What error message do you get?


7 Sept 2020


I can open Dulwich forum on my computer but for days now on my ipad it just says page unavailable try again.although prior to this happening there was now problem


An answer to allow me to use the ipad would be greatly appreciated


Regards

I noticed on Sunday that I wasn't able to access the forum from work on either Mozilla, Chrome or IE. It worked OK on my phone though and it is working fine here at home.

The error message I was getting at work was something like the host server isn't reponding or couldn't be verified.

The following is copied from parallel thread https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?12,2144464,2144604#msg-2144604 and slightly augmented. I emailed Admin about this yesterday evening but haven't heard anything yet. A couple of tweaks of my Firefox config hasn't made any difference.


I'm getting probably the same problem, since Saturday. "Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. Error code: SSL_ERROR_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ALERT * The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. * Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem."


This was using Firefox and IE9 on a Windows system; and Firefox and Lynx on a Centos 6.5 system. But this plucky little Raspberry Pi 3 running Raspbian and Chrome is getting through. All via home Plusnet. The forum server is, as expected, reachable from all these machines via ping or traceroute. Am browsing around for suggested local remedies, but first couple found haven't been of help.

  • Administrator

Hi


Thanks for the messages and apologies for the issues.


We have a problem with emails not going out from the server, the mail host recently updated to a protocol called TLS v1.3 and they suggested changing the forum to v1.3 as this will allow emails to go through. However not only do emails not go through it affects beople looking at the website.


Apologies and we'll try to get it changed back to an older version.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had a great experience with Paul. He sorted out a lighting issue we had very efficiently and I would highly recommend him! https://www.checkatrade.com/trades/edgleycontracting382245
    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...