Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I quite enjoyed this comparison on the Daily newspapers - not sure how objective it is but it scored the Mail as the worst and usefully give the source of the alternative name the Daily Hate: Alarmist headlines", providing "daily hate" according to former owner Lord Northcliffe. "More than any other newspaper in Britain, it deals in falsehood and distortion.


Staunchly right-wing. Populist, rabidly conservative, anti-Europe, anti-immigration, anti-taxation, anti-abortion, anti-permissive, concocted moral outrages18. Alastair Campbell said: "It's very hard to see how we can be happy as a nation when every day two million people buy the Daily Mail"


The review looks quite old and I am sure has some bias, but I am not letting that get in my way. The Morning Star is scored as neutral and the review doesn't have any more to say. http://www.humantruth.info/uk_newspapers_comparison.html

There have been several fake news stories about people ignoring social distancing in the right wing papers of late. A photo in the Express of a packed Brighton Beach (actually taken last summer) and several others which have been photo shopped, or distorted using a long lens. Makes me wonder what the agenda is?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There have been several fake news stories about

> people ignoring social distancing in the right

> wing papers of late. A photo in the Express of a

> packed Brighton Beach (actually taken last summer)

> and several others which have been photo shopped,

> or distorted using a long lens. Makes me wonder

> what the agenda is?


Blame Matt Hancock ? You have to give him credit for putting his head consistently above the parapet - even if he gives me shivers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's worth paying for someone who is properly qualified in my opinion. We did when we bought, but unfortunately the people selling to us had used some sort of mass conveyancing centre in Wales to save a few quid and they were rubbish. When I looked into selling our place I asked the estate agent who came to value it whether we could stipulate that a future buyer should use a proper conveyancer. They reckoned yes, so something you might consider asking for from your buyer if not too late. I guess it depends on demand, if there's a queue of buyers you're in a different place to make demands versus someone's been trying to sell their place for a year. I've used Wendy Burgess several times, it seems she's recently moved to a different practice: https://www.hcnlaw.co.uk/attorney/wendy-burgess/
    • Following on from Sue's post, this document looks useful as a single information source about the continuation of the Poundland brand:   https://www.pepcogroup.eu/media-news/pepco-group-completes-sale-of-poundland/.  From it I get that Pepco, the pre-sale parent company of Poundland, will have a minority share in the business (the CH record for the acquiring company seems to me consistent with that) and that "Under this new ownership, the business will be led by Barry Williams, currently Managing Director of Poundland. The business will continue to operate under the Poundland brand in the United Kingdom (and under the Dealz brand in the Isle of Man and Republic of Ireland)."
    • That was my question about Ed Davey and has he lost the plot? Are you a Lib Dem supporter? What do you think about his speech? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...