Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My 21 month old has always struggled to go down for naps but for the last 6 months or so has been pretty good, going down happily just after lunch for 1.5/2 hours. Lately though she is not into this nap at all. At nursery (3 days a week) she will still nap for 1.5 hours around 1ish but at home it?s an impossible task. I wonder if she?s just ready to drop all naps altogether? Apparently my siblings and I all dropped all naps by 18 months.. On nursery days when she does nap she then won?t go to bed until 9pm which in my opinion (and for our own sanity) is too late! I then find I have to wake her every morning at 730 and she?s still tired.


Just looking for some advice really, I think she?ll have to carry on having the nap at nursery as that?s what they do, although they have offered to wake her after 45 minutes/1 hour ? I feel wrong doing this though as think if she?s sleeping she must need it?Perhaps I should try keeping her up at home 4 days a week.. except then I find if we go out in buggy or car in the afternoon she drops off, but then as this nap is too late she?s up till late at night again, aaah!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25246-more-toddler-napsleep-woes/
Share on other sites

I found this, my eldest had the L-O-N-G Childminders nap, but not at home. She used to do two long days and the childminder had a routine with the kiddies.


Both of my girls stopped having daily nap well before their 2nd birthday. Someday naps, others not...


I do find a tea at 5pm, means a early bed time.. Also no naps helps, but not always...


Best of luck with it all

My next question was going to be how to cope with a non-napping toddler?! She is not a fan of "quiet time" of any kind, gets bored with books etc.


Also, how early is too early for bedtime if there's no nap? I caught her rubbing eyes at 6pm last time but thought to myself surely that must be too early.. then I probably missed the window.. then she got overtired.. sigh!

I would drop her naps at home. She probably naps in nursery as everyone else does!


If you drop the nap at home get her to bath , put her pjs on have dinner. Read a book you have mentioned she does not like quiet time maybe try animating your voice?? Put the lights down low and slowly turn the lights off! Warm milk should help to before bed :)


It's jus a routine she needs to get into so start at 6pm with bath, pj, dinner, read and tuck into bed! By 8pm she will be in bed. It will take time but she will fall asleep after a few attempts x

have you tried putting her down later? Miss Oi's nap has shifted back from 12.30 when she was 1 to 2pm now she's 2 and a half. I think if she's not a fan of quiet time it's worth persevering with the nap, else you will probably have a very whingy child come 4 o'clock!


If she's rubbing her eyes at 6 start bath and bedtime then, it takes us about an hour from starting bathtime to lights out (including bath, milk and stories). Now she's napping later Miss Oi goes down about 8, but when she napped earlier she went to bed earlier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...