Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Clutterqueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tiddles Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > In light of today?s announcements and in view

> of

> > the founder of the Thursday clap for nhs

> > suggesting this now comes to a close - should

> we

> > make Thursdays at eight a ?boo for Boris? ?

>

> No.


Oh go on Clutterqueen,let them get all their pent up frustrations out.

All so childish, in 4 years you can vote got more things in my life to worry about why people have Todo stupid stuff is beyond me

Agree or disagree with him he's here for 4 years

It's always trial by media these days the only truth in most papers are the date and price

Same when an MP has an affair media decide he's got to be sacked who cares

Most prime minister's would not stick by there judgment of the personas they more concerned about there position

We are not a banana republic

think the boo thing is a bit rubbish - however


"Agree or disagree with him he's here for 4 years"


is categorically not going to happen - in 4 years:


Boris will be long gone

UK on way to being gone

possibly election well before 4 years time as well


"We are not a banana republic"


Then "we" need to stop behaving like one. Action without consequences is what happens in banana republics. Scotland had no problem telling senior people they had to leave when they broke with policy

It may be a silly thing to do but we are in weird times, where for the first time we have a prime minister who lacks integrity, underpinned by someone who lacks humility (and numerous other traits we would expect), as we seem to slide towards an American way of politics where flawed/sociopath character seems to win you popular support.


Having to wait four years adds to the frustration.


Having a big riot in Trafalgar Square, returning to my reference to Class War, was similarly an immature thing to do, but it was one piece of direct action/mass disobedience that did have some impact, albeit pushing at an open door as many Tory MPs did not support the poll tax

I never understood class war so what if people earn big bucks no I don't I grow up in council house left school at 15 but worked my way through life never jealous of big earners waist of energy

As for what he did if I had a child and was in the position to do that I bloody would he put no 9ne in danger and seeing his boss so ill I would have been terrified of what could happen Yes poll tax was unfair but sacking someone for this

Can you imagine the people who did break the rules being sack a friend of mine drove from Kent to Newcastle just to see her son and girlfriend he's a mummy boy she and her husband are high risk fat diabetes and bad chest I told her she's crazy but didn't care

I understand strong feelings so each to there own, there will always be rich and poor most of us in the middle

And Boris father didn't make money until the 80s he got a scholarship for Oxford and lived with his nan in a run down place in Wales

But freedom of speech is good and each to there own

Everything you listed says we ARE a banana republic !!


Gaynor Hill Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All so childish, in 4 years you can vote got more

> things in my life to worry about why people have

> Todo stupid stuff is beyond me

> Agree or disagree with him he's here for 4 years

> It's always trial by media these days the only

> truth in most papers are the date and price

> Same when an MP has an affair media decide he's

> got to be sacked who cares

> Most prime minister's would not stick by there

> judgment of the personas they more concerned about

> there position

> We are not a banana republic

Gaynor Hill Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> a friend of mine drove from Kent to

> Newcastle just to see her son and girlfriend he's

> a mummy boy she and her husband are high risk fat

> diabetes and bad chest I told her she's crazy but

> didn't care



Yeah fair enough.

When we are ALL asked to limit our movements for a nationally important emergency, if you feel it doesn't apply to you just flick it off and do whatever you want.

Freedom of rights, right ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...