Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oxford University is undertaking a major study on psychological health (and lack of it) related to Covid 19. It will be in several stages to track progress and changes. They are looking to recruit volunteers. I have joined the study - the questionnaire is not difficult and it is quite interesting. I have no links with the study or its supporters.


https://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpsychiatryoxford.qualtrics.com%2Fjfe%2Fform%2FSV_8owcGAKKo1dL1vD&h=AT2T007Uzb3sEZS-3iWXJoro3quCTsLbXBIvN6eupXvofS9Ukp3nGiIGbF40IKqO2HIOpys-oJSJ021yEoiIZhRpF2eSswLodr0SDHOKdRSYdZiiOGn9gMUxzgK0Ripsru7bnntiaZFVVYJBEw&s=1&extid=6GR2NBZbATRxQypJ

I just did that survey.


I thought it was far too long, repetitive and poorly designed.


Even the very first part collecting demographic data assumes that if you are British you must be white. Surely they should have got advice on what ethnicity categories to use?


Nobody seems to have properly checked any of it over. Some of the questions insist you answer supplementary questions even though you then have no option but to give answers which are not true/do not make sense in the context of your answer to the original question.


If you don't, you can't move on to the next part.


And there is no way to comment on any issues you may have with the survey itself. Even YouGov surveys let you do that!


I'm not impressed. I assume a student has produced this and their supervisor has not properly looked at it.

I did it. Some of the questions seemed repetetive but isn't that how they do psychometric tests to elicit a consistent response no matter how the question is phrased? I did it because I wanted to convey my feelings about the pandemic as I have never felt those feelings before.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------Claims to be inactive now so

> can't check it out :).



Perhaps other people have pointed out the problems and they are belatedly sorting them.


As the survey stood, even apart from the other issues, they could never have broken down the results by ethnicity, which I would have thought was a pretty important thing to look at, particularly given the apparently disproportionate numbers of BAME people testing positive for Covid-19.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The experiment where volunteers gave electric

> shocks to another volunteer always makes me think

> what an experiment is really measuring and what

> they're looking for - we probably aren't mean't to

> do that and should just do them without the

> 'metathought' :).



I don't think you can fairly compare Milgram's experiment with a survey on the effects of a pandemic on people's mental health 🤣

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The experiment where volunteers gave electric

> > shocks to another volunteer always makes me

> think

> > what an experiment is really measuring and what

> > they're looking for - we probably aren't mean't

> to

> > do that and should just do them without the

> > 'metathought' :).

>

>

> I don't think you can fairly compare Milgram's

> experiment with a survey on the effects of a

> pandemic on people's mental health 🤣


LOL see it's famous and agree it isn't comparable but it sticks in my mind.

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Islington council used these psychometric tests

> about 15 years ago that I knew of ( don't know

> about now) but

> https://blog.mettl.com/talent-hub/10-companies-usi

> ng-psychometric-testing

>

> it could be an insidious way of excluding

> candidates imo



The Oxford University study has nothing to do with psychometric testing.


To the best of my (admittedly out of date) knowledge, psychometric tests are quite commonly used in recruitment and the results would normally be used in conjunction with other information about a candidate, though also possibly as a first stage of selection if there were a lot of candidates.


Nothing insidious about it.


Obviously you have to exclude candidates somehow, otherwise everybody who applied would get the job 🤣

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It doesn't matter what channel is was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is morally wrong and everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it. Most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how the story is told; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
    • Hadn't realised that the Panorama programme that people are up in arms about was over a year ago.  There wasn't much fuss at the time so why drag it up.  Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings. The programme was clumsy, but the vast majority of us know that Trump had an influence.  So the Telegraph has played into his hands.
    • I tried a Lime bike once, too heavy and bulky for me but I understand that many really like them.  And very much support the concept.
    • 👋 Hello East Dulwich community! We’re Trade Hub — your local team of Gas Safe engineers, plumbers, and specialist tradespeople. Founded by two Gas Safe engineers with over 35 years of combined experience in heating, plumbing, and home renovations. After years of working independently (and building thousands of word-of-mouth recommendations!), we joined forces to create a company that’s all about reliability, transparency, quality workmanship, and fair pricing. 🔧 Our services: Boiler installations, servicing & repairs. Gas Safe Landlord Certificates. Power flushing & radiator repairs. Full bathroom renovations. General plumbing (all aspects covered) 💡 Why Choose Us: Professional & transparent communication — from first contact to final sign-off. High-quality workmanship — backed by over 35 years of plumbing and heating experience. Fully insured and supported by manufacturer guarantees and extended boiler warranties (up to 12 years). Flexible, reliable scheduling to suit your needs. Trusted by homeowners — with 5-star reviews across Google and social media. We might be new to this platform, but we’re definitely not new to the trade — and we’re always happy to help with free quotes or friendly advice. 📞 Get in touch: E: [email protected] T: 020 8050 5108 / 07387 381030 W: www.tradehubplumbingandheating.co.uk Trade Hub Plumbing & Heating Reliable • Professional • Trusted Phone Number: 07387381030 Email Address: [email protected] Website: https://www.tradehubplumbingandheating.co.uk/ View full listing
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...