Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have only posted a few times over the years that I've been on here, mainly having used the EDF for buying and selling. Great to see that open again btw! I would like to post this though about a JR that a Solicitor, Jessica Learmond-Criqui, is crowdfunding for at https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/5g-judicial-review-2020/


This is NOT about Covid-19. I am reading and hearing so much about 5G, especially on social media, but this appears to be the only practical approach to having a review of the roll out of 5G rather than just talking about it! I would like to see the roll out halted until it has been reviewed and discussed more by scientists and other field experts for and against it. There are interesting facts and information here along with some videos. The latest videos in the Case Updates header I will admit I haven't had the chance to watch yet but I have this one by Professor Tom Butler posted on 11 May

it is 40mins long and a good watch. I know that some of what he talks about is to do with the actual devices we use ie phones in children's pockets but all the long term implications are so scary of something that just appears to be getting rushed through.


I looked Prof. Butler up and saw that the Press Ombudsman had upheld a complaint made by him against the Irish Times that impressed me with the way the media behave a lot of the time as we are seeing now https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/professor-tom-butler-and-the-irish-times-1.4164003 I love the line "everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts"


I wanted to bring this all to your attention as at first the funder was for an initial ?50k, I'm glad to see it has now passed that, but more funds will be needed.... Whatever you think of 5G, for or against, if you are against it and want further time, discussion and debate given over to it I think this woman, and the other people required to present it, is worth a donation or at least your time to read and watch what she's putting across.


Just for the record I have no association with her at all I am just a very concerned localish person.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/253342-5g-judicial-review/
Share on other sites

We had this about 3G and 4G IIRC and cell phones and TVs in my dads day (I remember the warnings). The Radiation Research Trust are warning of 5G but go back 12 years and ... http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/05/wi-fi-quackery-and-parliament.html so really they should just say they don't like Wi-Fi, Mobiles or any G whatsoever from 2G.


Some people do seem to have a sensitivity to EM Radiation (think Saul Goodmans brother in the series - someone I worked with claimed similar) - but that seems to include the Sun (I don't like sunny days myself).

Government advice: https://www.hse.gov.uk/radiation/nonionising/faqs.htm


Whole teams of scientists advise on this. I worked with them on ionising radiation in the past. Although worryingly the Centre for Radiation and Chemical and Environmental Hazards of Public Health England (formerly National Radiological Protection Board) has all but disappeared from the gov web site.

Funding lawyers wouldn't normally be a priority of mine! For me this looks like the only option of action out there to have a voice heard against 5G until all health implications, not just EMR, and how it can also effect animals and insects is challenged. Why do we just have to accept what we're being told. The concerns and questioning are based on scientific and medical studies, not just government or technology firms with a vested interest. I wish I was smarter and had the time to look into this in depth more myself with the info that's out there and that's another reason why I'm behind this Solicitor because she's doing just that https://www.scribd.com/document/460615982/JLC-Note-Re-5G-Health-Impact-Briefings-4-11-19

6G is on it's way from China


https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Race-for-6G-South-Korea-and-China-off-to-early-leads


The density of masts required does seem to increase with every generation (although I've seen it all before so no worries)


"But in terms of range, the transmission distance of 6G base stations will be only 200 meters or less.

This means "we'll need base stations 10 times a population," said Tetsuya Kawanishi, professor at Waseda University in Tokyo."

Japan has about 600,000 base stations, he said, projecting that 6G will require 1 billion nationwide and up to 100 billion globally.

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All my bee's died this year, was that 5G?



Bee Serious but if you are worried you can always do what my friend does to block alien signals influencing her mind and wear a tin foil cap - she says it's for highlights but I've read the conspiracy theories and she's always got it on....

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > All my bee's died this year, was that 5G?

>

>

> Bee Serious but if you are worried you can always

> do what my friend does to block alien signals

> influencing her mind and wear a tin foil cap - she

> says it's for highlights but I've read the

> conspiracy theories and she's always got it on....


Saul Goodman's brother you see - when someone I worked with said they had the same I was speechless - Do you treat it as real or imagined (I treated it as real as no harm to do so and I can't feel what others feel if I can't relate at all)

How do you know? where is your evidence?


I am sick of people making statements based on nothing but ignorance.




Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 5G is dangerous for wildlife.

>

> Fact that people are less affected means it

> largely bypasses people's level of interest.

MrsMcC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is from the website I posted above:

> https://actionagainst5g.org/wp-content/uploads/202

> 0/04/kompetenzinitiative-ev_study_bees-birds-and-m

> ankind_04-08_english.pdf



That paper is 47 pages of conjecture and false-assumption and provides little to no evidence of anything at all. It's also old and has nothing to do with 5G.


My conclusion is that the author's surname is an anagram.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...