Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have only posted a few times over the years that I've been on here, mainly having used the EDF for buying and selling. Great to see that open again btw! I would like to post this though about a JR that a Solicitor, Jessica Learmond-Criqui, is crowdfunding for at https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/5g-judicial-review-2020/


This is NOT about Covid-19. I am reading and hearing so much about 5G, especially on social media, but this appears to be the only practical approach to having a review of the roll out of 5G rather than just talking about it! I would like to see the roll out halted until it has been reviewed and discussed more by scientists and other field experts for and against it. There are interesting facts and information here along with some videos. The latest videos in the Case Updates header I will admit I haven't had the chance to watch yet but I have this one by Professor Tom Butler posted on 11 May

it is 40mins long and a good watch. I know that some of what he talks about is to do with the actual devices we use ie phones in children's pockets but all the long term implications are so scary of something that just appears to be getting rushed through.


I looked Prof. Butler up and saw that the Press Ombudsman had upheld a complaint made by him against the Irish Times that impressed me with the way the media behave a lot of the time as we are seeing now https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/professor-tom-butler-and-the-irish-times-1.4164003 I love the line "everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts"


I wanted to bring this all to your attention as at first the funder was for an initial ?50k, I'm glad to see it has now passed that, but more funds will be needed.... Whatever you think of 5G, for or against, if you are against it and want further time, discussion and debate given over to it I think this woman, and the other people required to present it, is worth a donation or at least your time to read and watch what she's putting across.


Just for the record I have no association with her at all I am just a very concerned localish person.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/253342-5g-judicial-review/
Share on other sites

We had this about 3G and 4G IIRC and cell phones and TVs in my dads day (I remember the warnings). The Radiation Research Trust are warning of 5G but go back 12 years and ... http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/05/wi-fi-quackery-and-parliament.html so really they should just say they don't like Wi-Fi, Mobiles or any G whatsoever from 2G.


Some people do seem to have a sensitivity to EM Radiation (think Saul Goodmans brother in the series - someone I worked with claimed similar) - but that seems to include the Sun (I don't like sunny days myself).

Government advice: https://www.hse.gov.uk/radiation/nonionising/faqs.htm


Whole teams of scientists advise on this. I worked with them on ionising radiation in the past. Although worryingly the Centre for Radiation and Chemical and Environmental Hazards of Public Health England (formerly National Radiological Protection Board) has all but disappeared from the gov web site.

Funding lawyers wouldn't normally be a priority of mine! For me this looks like the only option of action out there to have a voice heard against 5G until all health implications, not just EMR, and how it can also effect animals and insects is challenged. Why do we just have to accept what we're being told. The concerns and questioning are based on scientific and medical studies, not just government or technology firms with a vested interest. I wish I was smarter and had the time to look into this in depth more myself with the info that's out there and that's another reason why I'm behind this Solicitor because she's doing just that https://www.scribd.com/document/460615982/JLC-Note-Re-5G-Health-Impact-Briefings-4-11-19

6G is on it's way from China


https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Race-for-6G-South-Korea-and-China-off-to-early-leads


The density of masts required does seem to increase with every generation (although I've seen it all before so no worries)


"But in terms of range, the transmission distance of 6G base stations will be only 200 meters or less.

This means "we'll need base stations 10 times a population," said Tetsuya Kawanishi, professor at Waseda University in Tokyo."

Japan has about 600,000 base stations, he said, projecting that 6G will require 1 billion nationwide and up to 100 billion globally.

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All my bee's died this year, was that 5G?



Bee Serious but if you are worried you can always do what my friend does to block alien signals influencing her mind and wear a tin foil cap - she says it's for highlights but I've read the conspiracy theories and she's always got it on....

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > All my bee's died this year, was that 5G?

>

>

> Bee Serious but if you are worried you can always

> do what my friend does to block alien signals

> influencing her mind and wear a tin foil cap - she

> says it's for highlights but I've read the

> conspiracy theories and she's always got it on....


Saul Goodman's brother you see - when someone I worked with said they had the same I was speechless - Do you treat it as real or imagined (I treated it as real as no harm to do so and I can't feel what others feel if I can't relate at all)

How do you know? where is your evidence?


I am sick of people making statements based on nothing but ignorance.




Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 5G is dangerous for wildlife.

>

> Fact that people are less affected means it

> largely bypasses people's level of interest.

MrsMcC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is from the website I posted above:

> https://actionagainst5g.org/wp-content/uploads/202

> 0/04/kompetenzinitiative-ev_study_bees-birds-and-m

> ankind_04-08_english.pdf



That paper is 47 pages of conjecture and false-assumption and provides little to no evidence of anything at all. It's also old and has nothing to do with 5G.


My conclusion is that the author's surname is an anagram.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...