Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I do a wash and take the load out lots of undisolved washing powder comes out with the clothes. I've checked that the machine is heating the water (in case it was only using cold water), I've checked the filter and the powder tray:both fine. Anyone got any ideas? May be time to get a new washing machine but thought I'd ask.


Thanks

L

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25486-washing-machine-problem/
Share on other sites

Hi all,


thanks for your suggestions. The powder is not staying in the draw it is getting into the machine. It's at the end of the wash when I take the clothes out of the machine that quite a bit of undissolved powder comes out with the wet clothes. It may be the water pressure: I turned my water pressure down recently because when I turn on the kitchen tap it blasts out, so I'm going to turn it back up again and see if that is the problem. Otherwise buy some gel. I haven't changed my powder and the machine is about 6yrs old and this has just started happening recently so if the above dosen't work time for a new machine!


Once again thanks for your responses.


L

Water may be getting warm but not hot enough.

Some powders work at lower temperatures / some do not


Try a Hotter Setting.

If you still have problems


It could be a faulty Heater or Thermostat.


Changing to a Gel will not fix the problem with your machine if there is a fault.


Fox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The local councillor in question took home £50,172.71 in allowances and expenses in 23/24 on top of his full time salary as a teacher (which includes several weeks paid holiday). https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-12/Member allowances 2023-24 - individual figures.pdf   I'm sure many hard working people at Sainsbury's would be delighted to make quite so much money.
    • Did anything actually crash into a pedestrian? Hope they are ok if so.
    • I don't care particularly for McAsh, the Greens or their drugs policy, but this "Greens will feed your children crack at school" stuff from the Daily Mail is just hysterical nonsense. Labour should be ashamed for seeding it - and the Mail doesn't know any better. Meanwhile, I can't remember the exact Tweet I saw recently but it was something like "some people who believe all politicians are out to enrich themselves only say that because they can't imagine serving their community for its own sake". The idea that serving as a local councillor (including dealing with the public, internal party politics - which is always the most vicious where the stakes are lowest, and plenty of unpaid prep work) is a great pathway for careerists and moneygrabbers is utter shite. On a per hour basis you'd be far better off working at Sainsbos.
    • That’s awful - I really hope no one is seriously injured. It might be worth updating the title so it clearly reflects what happened: a driver crashed into a pedestrian. The way we describe collisions matters, because it shapes how people understand responsibility and risk. If a cyclist hit someone, it would sound odd to say “bike hit pedestrian” without mentioning the rider - yet when cars are involved, the driver often disappears from the wording. Using accurate language isn’t about blaming anyone before the facts are known; it’s simply about recognising that vehicles don’t act on their own. Drivers have agency, and it would be helpful if the wording reflected that.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...