Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting

So a technique of grabbing negative issues by the council which could in a cynical world, be used to introduce measures without getting positive perspective on the area


They need to properly engage and also ask if people don't have problem otherwise two cyclists (for example) could get a street closed as no-one made any positive comments saying there is no issues along the same street


Just my musings mind

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What I don't understand is why the council are

> using that platform for these surveys instead of

> their in house respurces. The company behind it is

> backed by private equity funds. That's not very

> labour like


I wondered this, which is why I shared. This popped up on Facebook, but not exactly aimed at me, more a placed ad.

siousxiesue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Abe_froeman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What I don't understand is why the council are

> > using that platform for these surveys instead

> of

> > their in house respurces. The company behind it

> is

> > backed by private equity funds. That's not very

> > labour like

>

> I wondered this, which is why I shared. This

> popped up on Facebook, but not exactly aimed at

> me, more a placed ad.


Popped up on Facebook - wow, that's interesting. Do you mind me asking where you are based? It could well be that the council, or their agents, are geo-targeting certain areas.


Has anyone else had this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...