Graffiti taggers

[seenbeen]

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That?s a pain. I end up cleaning tags off my house

> a few times a year. Some are easier than others.

>

> Based on where I saw him pause, I think last

> night?s tagger was spraying ?PATS?:

> https://i.imgur.com/wRYtzc6.jpg

Interesting that he appears to have obliterated someone else's tag...I have noticed an increase in tagging since the covid 19

[KidKruger]

So alice you can do even better work by explaining what you mean by your initial comment above.

That would be good work.

Then we?ll see if,?..not being about to answer questions to explain your own posts makes you look dumb?.

Good work indeed !

[JohnL]

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The chap I watched last

> night was a nicely dressed twenty-something in a

> button-down shirt with a preppy leather-strapped

> backpack. When he got to outside my house he

> looked around furtively (although not upwards to

> where I was) and started shaking his can: my wall

> is like catnip for taggers. When I called down and

> politely asked him not to do it, he stopped and

> ambled off. The whole experience was all terribly

> middle class.

I think that description fits the guy who tagged the undertakers opposite me. Only wall that's cleaned up regularly on Rye Lane.

His girlfriend waited patiently further down the road.

[pk]

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So alice you can do even better work by explaining

> what you mean by your initial comment above.

> That would be good work.

>

Says the person refusing to explain what they meant by their initial comment above

[KalamityKel]

Let's stay on topic and keep the squabbles somewhere else. This isn't the lounge afterall :-)

[alice]

Like you did in your 06.45 post!

[KalamityKel]

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like you did in your 06.45 post!

If you are referring to my inquiry as to what was on your mind you will find it was certainly related to this thread as you had clearly expressed concern.

To stop you from getting excited that you can continuing trolling here... just don't I'm not interested.

If you have something to get off your chest regarding the topic of graffiti and tagging then please do but no, don't suggestively aim anything at me thank you.

[alice]

When you post early in the morning annoyed that someone is not replying then I think it?s you that?s trolling but maybe it?s just a hot day

[KidKruger]

Posted by alice Yesterday, 08:44PM, ?What a nasty thread?.

OK so let?s remove alice?s excuse for not backing-up her ?What a nasty thread? post..

The alice person over a number of threads has commented on / hauled people up over (what one can only assume is) their comments on variously race, wealth/privilege, younger generations (ie. yoof) behaviour.

I assume this time it?s because someone mentioned their assumptions on profiling for taggers.

I?m just calling it out for what (I think) it is - an attempt to scold posters for (again, what I believe is) innocent and well-intended comments, their only misdemeanour being that it?s perhaps possible, if you?re hell-bent on doing so, to extract something racist, wealth-privileged or anti-youth from them.

By far most people posting are pretty well balanced and reasonable, not requiring the ?unelected comment police? to moderate and censor our posts for us.

That?s my point in my post, and I hope no-one perceives my post as incendiary, but if someone?s gonna act the offendee publicly they should be called out when it?s over the top - publicly.

There?s been too much of this soft-accusing lately and it?s a reverse form of bullying IMO.

And no, I?m not going to trawl through your past posts to give you ?evidence?, you know full well your own posting history.

OK alice, no distractions, no excuses, what do mean by ?What a nasty thread? ?!

Grow a spine and be honest.

I?m betting you cannot do that.

[KidKruger]

Here you pk, feast on that.

Now, what in the world did YOU think I meant in my post earlier ?!

You?re acting all ignorant like you haven?t the capacity to understand, when you actually have - the fact that you?re able to stay conscious and actually type proves that.

So, what did you think I meant - spell it out.

Or is it a case of you?re dumb now cos you ain?t answering in full - seeing as you want to set the bar there ?!

[pk]

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here you pk, feast on that.

> Now, what in the world did YOU think I meant in my

> post earlier ?!

You were very nonspecific so hard to tell but you were obviously dancing around an issue which you can?t tolerate when others do it

> So, what did you think I meant - spell it out.

> Or is it a case of you?re dumb now cos you ain?t

> answering in full - seeing as you want to set the

> bar there ?!

Answering in full, I don?t know why you refuse to be clear about what you?re saying, cos eg ?various cards? is in fact not very clear so I don?t know what you meant but I think your comments were not very thought thru

[KidKruger]

pk

Grow a spine and answer the question - you?ve a gob enough to pursue someone else for an answer, so do it yourself.

?what in the world did YOU think I meant in my post earlier ?!?

[KalamityKel]

<-- I saw this. Maybe let's all have a time out for reflection...

[KidKruger]

Ha ha!! I was looking for exactly that YouTube clip earlier, and was going to attach it but couldn?t figure out how to embed it. Exactly the phrase that springs to mind!

Good track too.

Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

saw this. Maybe let's all have a time out for

> reflection...

[pk]

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk

> Grow a spine and answer the question - you?ve a

> gob enough to pursue someone else for an answer,

I asked you what you meant and you won?t tell me

You just bang on about me telling you what you meant

That?s weird

> so do it yourself.

> ?what in the world did YOU think I meant in my

> post earlier ?!?

I don?t know

Please see my answer immediately above your question

Is it my turn for an answer now?

You might better placed to explain you meant

[KidKruger]

Disingenuous but at least consistent.

If you can?t be straight up, then don?t demand me to be, OK ?

[pk]

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Disingenuous but at least consistent.

> If you can?t be straight up, then don?t demand me

> to be, OK ?

Weird

You posted something

I asked you what you meant

You went all weird