Irresponsible, illegal (?) public events

[KidKruger]

Au contraire.

'Like' not everybody gets to close a street, so they can have tea dances.

Like that.

northernmonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like - oh, I dunno, rye lane as posted earlier??!

[alice]

Benevolent??!! Ha

But good news

[Bicknell]

Got legal advice from a QC. why did they care that much? beyond me.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f20556c9901276144543bb3/t/5f36be2c471fb44cb171bb47/1597423177107/Legal+Advice.pdf

[JohnL]

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to see the folks of some busy back street

> in Peckham try to get away with the same kind of

> street closures.

Sternhall Lane used to be a shortcut - now it's a footpath to the Montpelier for me :)

[Dogkennelhillbilly]

"People congregating in this manner create an obstacle for both cyclists and pedestrians."

And weirdly it's only the Range Rover mob moaning about it. Loving the arguments here: not being able to drive from my house to the local shop is a breach of my human rights, but people should not be allowed to sit in the open air and listen to tweet music without a government licence. Brilliant!