Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

They have progressed well.


The North side was relatively simple.


Taking up old paving slabs.. levelling off ... laying new slabs...


The East side mostly has no slabs.. Just tarmac.

I think it 'MAY' be a little more difficult to get things level. 'MAYBE' not. ??


Foxy

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I suspect everyone on Ulverscroft Rd would of received notification from Conway's

that work on renewing Pavements has been halted as from Wednesday 7th October due to lack of

supplies of required materials.


Work hopefully to recommence on October 26th. and end date of 18th December.


DulwichFox

  • 2 weeks later...

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Work is again underway.

>

> **WARNING** They are moving Cars..

>



If they have moved cars, I'm guessing it's probably because those cars ignored cones, and warnings chalked on the pavement that there should be no parking there today .....

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's run a book on how long these new pavements

> remain level and puddle-free.

> I say 9 months until the first sunken area.



To be fair, KK, that's not likely to be Conway's fault.


More likely due to things like clay soil and trees, surely?

To be fair, KK, that's not likely to be Conway's fault.


More likely due to things like clay soil and trees, surely?


Conway cannot be blamed for e.g. newly planted trees after their work is completed, but with existing conditions - such as existing trees and existing subsoil a good contractor should be working with these in mind. Since biblical times ('houses built on sand') the importance of foundation work has been understood. In some areas which are otherwise paved the areas around trees are left either clear (with e.g. gravel) or are tarmacked, to allow root movement without disturbing paving stones. Displacement in under a year is clear evidence of shoddy work.

If I can predict pavements failing after a short number of years and the contractor can't (although obviously they can, and know there will be repeat custom as a result) there's a problem.

I'm just basing my statement on their work elsewhere including LL and surrounding seats.

Forgive my cynicism, I just dislike repeat mistakes.

Where is there any evidence of NEW Trees.


I think that Markings of 'TREE' on the pavement are indicative of old trees that have been removed

leaving roots / stumps.


There is a 'TREE' marking on the pavement on Whateley road just 4 foot from a lower level sunken Basement area.

There is NO possibility that a new tree could be placed there.


Foxy

Eh?


They painted lines around the existing trees in the road some time ago.


I contacted the council to ask what they were for. I was worried that they were going to remove the trees.


They were to show the contractors where to put the paving stones around the trees, i.e. how big a tree pit to leave.


Nobody has mentioned anything about new trees in the road, to the best of my knowledge!


ETA: Penguin's reference to new trees above is hypothetical.

🤣


Indeed. Most people in the road get their info from the road WhatsApp group, which everyone in the road was invited to join ...


However the thread may be useful to others living round the road, as parking is very restricted and much of the pavement is closed to pedestrians.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...