Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looking at Trump yesterday on the news in Wisconsin he seemed to be more CGI than human. It wasn't like many older people in the states where the cosmetic surgery is obvious. But it reminded me of Max Headroom - younger readers may not be aware that this was an early and very entertaining CGI talking head. And also Kryten out of red dwarf. This thread is purely for entertainment as it is not really appropriate to criticise a politician, let alone anyone else, for their strange looks.




https://acrossthepondtv.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/10-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-red-dwarf/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/262561-president-trump-cgi/
Share on other sites

In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him based on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting progress in many fields back by years, environment, world peace and friction between countries, US citizens? health and economic welfare, international trade, division within American society. Morally bankrupt and intent on causing harm, calling him fascist would be a compliment to the man.

He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him based

> on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

> The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting

> progress in many fields back by years,

> environment, world peace and friction between

> countries, US citizens? health and economic

> welfare, international trade, division within

> American society. Morally bankrupt and intent on

> causing harm, calling him fascist would be a

> compliment to the man.

> He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.



That is literally what the democrats are doing. They have gone from terrorist sympathisers to terrorists themselves.

The democrats have made Trump's 2020 re election far too easy, with anyone sane fleeing the party.


You might want to keep up & take a look at the #WalkAway movement, instead of immersing yourself in fake media.


 

What I said about Trump stands.

Regardless of what the Democratic party is doing.

I don?t see that one invalidates the other.

The guy is a psychopath and the behaviour of one or any number of people, including a political party, doesn?t change that.

Though it seems like you think otherwise.


ED Bird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him

> based

> > on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

> > The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting

> > progress in many fields back by years,

> > environment, world peace and friction between

> > countries, US citizens? health and economic

> > welfare, international trade, division within

> > American society. Morally bankrupt and intent

> on

> > causing harm, calling him fascist would be a

> > compliment to the man.

> > He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.

>

>

> That is literally what the democrats are doing.

> They have gone from terrorist sympathisers to

> terrorists themselves.

> The democrats have made Trump's 2020 re election

> far too easy, with anyone sane fleeing the party.

>

> You might want to keep up & take a look at the

> #WalkAway movement, instead of immersing yourself

> in fake media.

>

>

I'm sure he has compared himself to all action American heroes. I couldn't find any links but found this interesting article on films that predicted the rise of the machines, sorry Trump, starting off with Citizen Kane and Duck Soup. https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-lists/idiocracy-2016-20-movies-that-predicted-trumps-rise-251803/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pointless unless Southwark will make money from this being erected.  If that’s the case, it will be allowed.
    • Yes, there's no way anyone would want a Wi-Fi hub in Lordship Lane. Absolutely pointless. Anyone who actually wants or needs to communicate or access data will already have their 5G phone or satellite phone on them to get fast data. And of course we are lucky that we have such a strong and unbroken mobile signal from all suppliers locally. With no dead spots. 
    • I see from the Site Notice https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/files/B867B0B45973C03BE4D45CE4513BDE35/pdf/25_AP_2825-SITE_NOTICE-4151698.pdf that the "Comment by" date is 5 November. My understanding is that comments submitted after that date can and ?will still be considered if the decision-making hasn't yet been done; so I wouldn't let the date in itself deter you if you  want to comment now.   Was the site notice actually posted near the location, btw? Does the hub have any claimed functions other than advertising?
    • Whilst reading about what was Poundland, I saw that BT has applied to install (block the pavement with) one of its large screen advertising 'street hubs' outside the building. This seems like a terrible idea in my opinion - others may disagree - but you might want to look at the planning application and comment. There is still a day or two to do so.  Here's the relevant application 25/AP/2825 https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=T3G4H5KBH1500 and how it will look https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/files/BDF327FA0103A31946387A251B9C9D45/pdf/25_AP_2825-ELEVATION_PLAN-4143504.pdf
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...