Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looking at Trump yesterday on the news in Wisconsin he seemed to be more CGI than human. It wasn't like many older people in the states where the cosmetic surgery is obvious. But it reminded me of Max Headroom - younger readers may not be aware that this was an early and very entertaining CGI talking head. And also Kryten out of red dwarf. This thread is purely for entertainment as it is not really appropriate to criticise a politician, let alone anyone else, for their strange looks.




https://acrossthepondtv.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/10-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-red-dwarf/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/262561-president-trump-cgi/
Share on other sites

In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him based on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting progress in many fields back by years, environment, world peace and friction between countries, US citizens? health and economic welfare, international trade, division within American society. Morally bankrupt and intent on causing harm, calling him fascist would be a compliment to the man.

He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him based

> on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

> The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting

> progress in many fields back by years,

> environment, world peace and friction between

> countries, US citizens? health and economic

> welfare, international trade, division within

> American society. Morally bankrupt and intent on

> causing harm, calling him fascist would be a

> compliment to the man.

> He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.



That is literally what the democrats are doing. They have gone from terrorist sympathisers to terrorists themselves.

The democrats have made Trump's 2020 re election far too easy, with anyone sane fleeing the party.


You might want to keep up & take a look at the #WalkAway movement, instead of immersing yourself in fake media.


 

What I said about Trump stands.

Regardless of what the Democratic party is doing.

I don?t see that one invalidates the other.

The guy is a psychopath and the behaviour of one or any number of people, including a political party, doesn?t change that.

Though it seems like you think otherwise.


ED Bird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him

> based

> > on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

> > The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting

> > progress in many fields back by years,

> > environment, world peace and friction between

> > countries, US citizens? health and economic

> > welfare, international trade, division within

> > American society. Morally bankrupt and intent

> on

> > causing harm, calling him fascist would be a

> > compliment to the man.

> > He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.

>

>

> That is literally what the democrats are doing.

> They have gone from terrorist sympathisers to

> terrorists themselves.

> The democrats have made Trump's 2020 re election

> far too easy, with anyone sane fleeing the party.

>

> You might want to keep up & take a look at the

> #WalkAway movement, instead of immersing yourself

> in fake media.

>

>

I'm sure he has compared himself to all action American heroes. I couldn't find any links but found this interesting article on films that predicted the rise of the machines, sorry Trump, starting off with Citizen Kane and Duck Soup. https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-lists/idiocracy-2016-20-movies-that-predicted-trumps-rise-251803/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...