Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looking at Trump yesterday on the news in Wisconsin he seemed to be more CGI than human. It wasn't like many older people in the states where the cosmetic surgery is obvious. But it reminded me of Max Headroom - younger readers may not be aware that this was an early and very entertaining CGI talking head. And also Kryten out of red dwarf. This thread is purely for entertainment as it is not really appropriate to criticise a politician, let alone anyone else, for their strange looks.




https://acrossthepondtv.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/10-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-red-dwarf/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/262561-president-trump-cgi/
Share on other sites

In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him based on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting progress in many fields back by years, environment, world peace and friction between countries, US citizens? health and economic welfare, international trade, division within American society. Morally bankrupt and intent on causing harm, calling him fascist would be a compliment to the man.

He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him based

> on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

> The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting

> progress in many fields back by years,

> environment, world peace and friction between

> countries, US citizens? health and economic

> welfare, international trade, division within

> American society. Morally bankrupt and intent on

> causing harm, calling him fascist would be a

> compliment to the man.

> He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.



That is literally what the democrats are doing. They have gone from terrorist sympathisers to terrorists themselves.

The democrats have made Trump's 2020 re election far too easy, with anyone sane fleeing the party.


You might want to keep up & take a look at the #WalkAway movement, instead of immersing yourself in fake media.


 

What I said about Trump stands.

Regardless of what the Democratic party is doing.

I don?t see that one invalidates the other.

The guy is a psychopath and the behaviour of one or any number of people, including a political party, doesn?t change that.

Though it seems like you think otherwise.


ED Bird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > In the case of Trump it?s fine to insult him

> based

> > on his looks. Or anything else for that matter.

> > The tinsel-haired orange-faced tawt is setting

> > progress in many fields back by years,

> > environment, world peace and friction between

> > countries, US citizens? health and economic

> > welfare, international trade, division within

> > American society. Morally bankrupt and intent

> on

> > causing harm, calling him fascist would be a

> > compliment to the man.

> > He deserves worse than insults, he?s a t w a t.

>

>

> That is literally what the democrats are doing.

> They have gone from terrorist sympathisers to

> terrorists themselves.

> The democrats have made Trump's 2020 re election

> far too easy, with anyone sane fleeing the party.

>

> You might want to keep up & take a look at the

> #WalkAway movement, instead of immersing yourself

> in fake media.

>

>

I'm sure he has compared himself to all action American heroes. I couldn't find any links but found this interesting article on films that predicted the rise of the machines, sorry Trump, starting off with Citizen Kane and Duck Soup. https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-lists/idiocracy-2016-20-movies-that-predicted-trumps-rise-251803/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I know the couple you mean, and she has always been friendly and smiley when delivering to me, but obviously in a hurry, for all the reasons outlined in the thread. My gate is always open, however (unless someone coming to the house closes it when they leave). I can't see the point of gates that have to be opened and shut again every time someone comes to the house. It just seems a waste of time, and it's annoying if you are carrying stuff. And a closed gate  conveys a sort of "my house is my fortress" feel. To me, anyway.
    • Thanks for posting this. Really interesting. It would be good if you added a star rating, so that it was easier to do comparisons / see what your top recommendations are. Great blog though!
    • Hi, Just a quick note to say it's six months since I launched Eats Dulwich. In that time I've reviewed 28 restaurants. Usually four or five a month except for a month when I came down with gout, which I guess is an occupational hazard. Don't say I don't suffer for my art. Early on someone – Sue, I think – asked me what I'm going to do when I've reviewed every restaurant in East Dulwich. I'm nowhere near that point, but what I have found is that a lot of new openings have tended to be in Rye Lane, so the site has expanded to cover SE15, hence the slight change of name (still haven't had any cease and desist letters from anything with a similar name).  Anyway, the site is still free, it would be great if as many readers as possible here can subscribe so that they automatically get new posts (when you try to subscribe the default might be paid subs but that's down to Substack, just tick the free option instead) as I don't post everything on EDF. Obviously you can get reviews elsewhere if you want, but I think this is the only proper site for local East Dulwich people written by a local East Dulwich person. If you like eating out please have a read. And if there are other places you think I should visit please mention them below and i'll do my best to try them. Link here: https://eatsdulwich.substack.com/  
    • Can you explain what your point was, then? Because it isn't clear to me. No. Perhaps you could provide a link and explain its relevance? That would be helpful     Those figures suggest that over 10,000,000 voters were not "rejecting a far left party."
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...