Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shrieker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They took mine away ages ago, but i simply just

> put any brown bin waste in neighbours bins and if

> they ask me about it, blame it on others in the

> street.


Well now we all know..


That really is antisocial when other people have to pay ?30.00


Fox

Shrieker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They took mine away ages ago, but i simply just

> put any brown bin waste in neighbours bins and if

> they ask me about it, blame it on others in the

> street.


dontbesilly said just the same thing. Funny that, it?s like you have the same mind


https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,2127729,2127767#msg-2127767

Shrieker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They took mine away ages ago, but i simply just

> put any brown bin waste in neighbours bins and if

> they ask me about it, blame it on others in the

> street.



Why is that not a surprise? Troll online, antisocial in real life.

Dullwitches Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is anyone else's garden waste not being collected?

> We purchased the subscription 3 weeks ago and

> still not received the sticker, but FAQS suggest a

> computer system gets updated so collection can

> occur sooner.


How much is the subscription and how any months does it cover?

Froglander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dullwitches Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Is anyone else's garden waste not being

> collected?

> > We purchased the subscription 3 weeks ago and

> > still not received the sticker, but FAQS suggest

> a

> > computer system gets updated so collection can

> > occur sooner.

>


How much is the subscription and how any months does it cover?


It is ?30.00 and covers a full year 12 months.


Collection every week


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Froglander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Dullwitches Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Is anyone else's garden waste not being

> > collected?

> > > We purchased the subscription 3 weeks ago and

> > > still not received the sticker, but FAQS

> suggest

> > a

> > > computer system gets updated so collection

> can

> > > occur sooner.

> >

>

> How much is the subscription and how any months

> does it cover?

>

> It is ?30.00 and covers a full year 12 months.

>

> Collection every week

>

> DulwichFox


Thanks for your reply. I looked at the Southwark website and noticed that the 12 month period runs from March to April. So you still pay the same amount for 1 month or 12 months. That is ludicrous.

Thanks for your reply. I looked at the Southwark website and noticed that the 12 month period runs from March to April. So you still pay the same amount for 1 month or 12 months. That is ludicrous.


To be fair to Southwark (and I very rarely write that) in the first fiscal year of operation when they started very late they did reduce the fee pro rata. For most people, having signed up once, the council expected them to sign-up again at the start of the fiscal - so having just one price (for 12 months) made bureaucratic sense (they didn't have to build in software for a sliding scale - as logic would always start the 'year' at the beginning of the council's fiscal year). Remember any price changes are implemented then following council votes for the budget.


I think paying pro-rata for months left to April would certainly be fairer - but might be overly complex for a council who are signally poor at their own CPZ charge management.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...