Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Some of you may be aware that, for a while now, we've been trying to get the data for all properties in Southwark, to help local residents and community groups get a better understanding of planning and related issues. We now have the full inventory and will need your help to make sure the data is as accurate and up-to-date as possible.

Please have a read and let us know what you think

http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthwark.co.uk/hold-news/news/2542-imagining-all-of-southwark

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26310-mapping-the-whole-of-southwark/
Share on other sites

hi, no, census counts people in all our shapes and sizes. what we've got is everything else (buildings and some land)


back in 2010, a group of us got together to get our heads round the core strategy, to try and read the document, collectively, work on our own comments and prepare for the examination in public where the govt's planning inspector goes through everything with a very fine comb. the group continues to operate as 'southwark planning network', a loose network of local residents and community groups who have an interest in planning, mainly strategic. one of the ongoing issues has been lack of data, which in turn made it very difficult for people to be able to meaningfully respond to strategic and other planning issues. street-by-street level of detail makes it easier to 'connect' to planning if you like, as planning is about so much more than shape/size of buildings, it's about the length of time you may need to get to your local gp or kids' school, it's about finding the space to create alternatives/improve your area (through reclaiming amenity spaces for safe play for children or for communal fruit & veg growing etc)


in an ideal world (and we will see if this is possible) we would be able to match the 'property' street-by-street data against the street-by-street census stuff (the census data does not got beyond ward level) - we've played around with the london-level census data when they released it earlier this year & things are quite interesting when you look at age groups for example). this would also show the density and any trends/changes over time etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I understand that she also has numerous motoring offenses,  Oh wait a second that was someone else https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y4558r5gko] Sadly a cross bencher so can't blame Starmer for this.   Here's a former Tory minister https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65696003
    • Not so fast @malumbu. This is not a nothing to see here moment (and for some of us on the forum it is local as her house is in Dulwich)- the BBC explain why, have a read: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgkvd3jg2no Southwark's role in this will be key - did they alert her, will they fine her (as they have done with other private landlords), was it someone in Southwark who leaked it? This government came in on a ticket of integrity and this type of thing is very damaging to that message - especially in light of other similar issues Starmer's front-bench has had - it cannot be one rule for them and one rule for us. @Dulwichway you know you're in political trouble when videos like that appear within hours of a story breaking.....and goes viral. 
    • The limit is supposed to be 25 per day.  Have you made that amount today? 
    • 🤣 Well, I can apparently  "react" provided I take up a whole other post to do it. I wonder when "today" ends, and what is my daily quota of "reactions"?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...