Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has he done a good job for London? I'm not sure myself, so interested in views.....


I know the role is more figurehead, than actually has powers to change many things....but we do need to vote soon.....


There's an article on the spectator about Sadiq which the link seems to be broken to when I try to post it. But u can search on their site if you want


https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/09/16/sadiq-khan-has-failed-londoners/


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/sadiq-khan

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/
Share on other sites

On Transport alone he is an abject failure. TfL was in debt before the Covid and then he allowed free fares (even though it's all contactless anyway!)...what an idiot. Now he wants another ?5 billion from central government. Not to mention the traffic chaos now. The Communities secretary should take over and Khan should step down . And JohnL wants him to have MORE powers.....

He proved what a puerile idiot he is WITH the Trump thing- he was an embarrassment of the highest order.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452516
Share on other sites

Actually seenbeen, TFLs debt was reducing under Khan, until the pandemic hit. All the figures are online for you to see for yourself. The money he now wants, is to offset the loss of income from massively reduced passengers due to the pandemic. You might also want to look at the part the government are playing in fueling that debt too ;)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452540
Share on other sites

seenbeen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On Transport alone he is an abject failure. TfL

> was in debt before the Covid and then he allowed

> free fares (even though it's all contactless

> anyway!)...what an idiot. Now he wants another ?5

> billion from central government. Not to mention

> the traffic chaos now. The Communities secretary

> should take over and Khan should step down . And

> JohnL wants him to have MORE powers.....

> He proved what a puerile idiot he is WITH the

> Trump thing- he was an embarrassment of the

> highest order.


If he could raise taxes or even keep the taxes already coming from London there would be a lot more coming in.


London has always subsidised the rest of the country.


https://www.theweek.co.uk/checked-out/84933/does-london-really-subsidise-the-uk


The argument for London having more independence isn't dependent on the Mayor of the moment - it's logical that London should have as much independence as Scotland. To be honest I don't think the Mayor has as much power as Ken Livingstone and the GLC did in the 80s.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452553
Share on other sites

BJ taking no interest in the detail caved in on TfL funding (loss of operational grant). Khan may have escalated the problem but the current PM started it. But of course as he is amusing we will let him off, let him off everything. BJ also proposed the ULEZ (not a bad thing in my opinion but very interventionist for a Tory mayor). But of course when you are a narcissist party politics don't come into play. BJ also quite happily spoke about London's position as a major power in Europe when he was Mayor and close working with Paris and Berlin. ie the EU. I was at two major Air Quality events when he said all of this. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-21443439 https://www.tssa.org.uk/en/whats-new/news/index.cfm/tfl-financial-review-must-herald-return-of-operating-grant And that vanity project the new ludicrously expensive routemaster.


Sorry to use this thread to bash the PM but he deserves it. Khan is just a bit underwhelming but not a crook as Ken became nor someone who's views just change with the wind/makes it up as he goes along as does BJ.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452675
Share on other sites

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to be controversial

>

> Do we need a mayor at all ?

>

> Just think about the layers of bureaucracy that

> can be peeled away without one. Much like when the

> GLA was disbanded 🤔


If London has a vote to increase or decrease devolution (and I'm OK with that - we can put abolish or extend on the ballot) then only fair so should Scotland and Wales (abolish, extend, independence).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452793
Share on other sites

ED Bird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just because you live in your own little bubble,

> JohnL, doesn't make everyone anti-British.


I'd have thought you would have accused me of living on a bit of a genrification leftie liberal bubble if anything LOL.


I'm old enough to have heard people say "best of british luck to you".

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452811
Share on other sites

"He's destroyed this countries capital & is now intent on destroying London's history."


could we go back in time to the last time London (this countries capital lest we forget) was up to scratch? Like, name the year?

Now please illustrate exactly what is wrong with it in 2020 and detail how it's on SK


Thanks


(my position on SK is that he has largely been underwhelming, even before covid. The arrival of Johnson and his open hostility and obvious maneouvres to deprive Khan of power have given me some sympathy towards him. And then there is the obvious point about how he acts as a ligntning rod for the.....less savoury elements of society. I don't think anyone who criticises Khan (often with good reason) should ignore this element.

So yes - he hasn't been great. But he was up against Zac Goldsmith (no!) and next Shaun Bailey (no x 2) So....)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452819
Share on other sites

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> (my position on SK is that he has largely been

> underwhelming, even before covid. The arrival of

> Johnson and his open hostility and obvious

> maneouvres to deprive Khan of power have given me

> some sympathy towards him. And then there is the

> obvious point about how he acts as a ligntning rod

> for the.....less savoury elements of society. I

> don't think anyone who criticises Khan (often with

> good reason) should ignore this element.

> So yes - he hasn't been great. But he was up

> against Zac Goldsmith (no!) and next Shaun Bailey

> (no x 2) So....)



Red letter day. I happen to agree with all of this Sept, nice summary.


It does seem a little like the conservatives aren't even really trying with their candidates the past 2 elections. One could argue they weren't trying with Boris, but that's a whole other discussion!) Perhaps they don't think it's worth the effort, but I would think if they put a higher profile candidate in this time they would be in with a shot.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452831
Share on other sites

"Red letter day. I happen to agree with all of this Sep"


I don't think it's quite the first time but notable all the same!


" One could argue they weren't trying with Boris"


Now HERE is a man who is destryoing the country. That said - it's easy to forget now that he is on his way out already but the Tories were definitely trying with him - he was popular, had a sheen of positivity and delivered a big majority


All a house built on sand of course - but he delivered in the short term ( for the Tories. And to borrow my Khan argument, he was up against a visibly useless Corbyn who would have struggled against anyone. Goldsmith/Bailey included)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263895-sadiq-khan/#findComment-1452849
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...