Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually seenbeen, TFLs debt was reducing under

> Khan, until the pandemic hit. All the figures are

> online for you to see for yourself. The money he

> now wants, is to offset the loss of income from

> massively reduced passengers due to the pandemic.

> You might also want to look at the part the

> government are playing in fueling that debt too ;)


So he decided to give it the kiss of death by unnecessarily allowing free fares. Then he tells everyone that the bus drivers will die.

This is hilarious (kind of!)


Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn?t it Hancock saying London is heading for

> lockdowns well?

>

> What would Khan?s hidden agenda be?

>

> Are Hancock and Johnson in on this hidden

> agenda??????


99 - 100 coming ready or not


I see you Sadiq hiding behind your mamma

I see you Matt hiding behind the sofa


Sigh too easy

Seems to me the only thing I can remember about this guy was him saying something about terrorism being part and parcel of living in a large city, or something like that. It was a clumsy thing to say, albeit a helpful one for those claiming that Islam is the root of all evil (it's from the horse's mouth, right?) though he did clarify what he meant afterwards, and he did do a pretty good job of explaining what he really meant. Apart from that I don't really know much else about him - and maybe that's rather telling.


He was an easy target for Trump.


I think he's probably a nice bloke really, but he'll almost certainly continue to take hits for being the man "in charge" whilst violent crime on London streets - especially amongst ethnic minorities (though not his) - has been a massive problem. He was on the radio a lot when knife crime was still making big news, arguing for more police. I suppose his time in office has coincided with Corbyn's. That can't have been 100% helpful to him whether you like JC or not. And London's been going through a tough time for the past few years with all that's been going on. Not all Sadiq Khan's fault obviously. I'd still have a pint with him.

To be fair to him, what he said was being prepared to deal with terrorist attacks was part of living in a major city. Having the resources to deal with the fallout from any attack


That seems entirely reasonable and not clumsy to me - any mayor of any City should hold that view

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peter whittle

>

>

> Didn?t know you?d gone to so much trouble there

> seenbeen. Quite the authority

>

> Jesus wept


It got better



Khan is unprofessional in the extreme....'I can see you're demoralised..','that's quite a slur- but coming from you that's no surprise' personal attacks on Whittle coming from Khan- then they all joined in....

  • 3 weeks later...

Today he is quoted in the evening standard asking for a review of the 10pm curfew as it is counter productive https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/sadiq-khan-10pm-curfew-review-london-counterproductive-a4566116.html


But I seem to remember that around the 21st September the mayor was asking for the 10pm curfew to be introduced. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-london-could-face-fresh-restrictions-under-mayors-new-plan-12077137


Confused dot com or as some papers might say

"Last orders for Mayor in u-turn fiasco"

  • 2 weeks later...
When I first started drinking 10.30 or even 10 was last orders. Pubs were shut in the afternoon, and Sunday's were even worse, in some parts (mainly parts of Wales) they were closed. Not sure if the little Englanders want to return to these halcyon days, or perhaps before WW1 when there were no limits. There were differences within London on drinking hours, and when I lived in Abingdon we had summer hours (11 close), it was very exciting when we moved to 11pm all year.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No

> He wants it revoked and to revert to normal

> drinking hours (see this tweet from today)

> https://twitter.com/MayorofLondon/status/131853111

> 4680668160?s=19

>

> As I said previously u turn by London mayor ?


I thought he supported the Welsh plan of a 3 week lockdown


He's now saying level 2 lockdown means people can't mix outside their bubble in pubs - I'm not sure pubs keep to that seeing what happens outside .


Anyway the creation of level 4 can't be far away - figures just reported on Sky News are a nightmare.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Someone I know who as family in Italy.told me pubs

> and restaurants were shutting at 10pm .as

> instructed to .but then were reopening about 10-15

> pm.as there were no guild lines as to when they

> could reopen.not sure if that's true.


Macron saw this coming in Paris and switched to a proper 9:00PM curfew


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-54585828

  • 2 months later...

I understand finances are stretched, and Kahn is trying to balance the books... but it does seem like his 'go to' is raising taxes/charges (10% council tax increase, a congestion charge for all of greater London of 5.50 a day, and the 'temporary' increase of the existing congestion charge to 15quid a day last year), rather than cutting waste/improving efficiencies/increase borrowing (at least for the short term).....if times were normal, I might prepared to be more accepting, but a 'tax first' attitude in the current environment is a real kick in the nuts for a lot of people.


He's lucky Shaun Bailey seems so inept as an alternative candidate....


https://www.cityam.com/london-tories-council-tax-hike-is-a-result-of-mayors-mistakes/

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understand finances are stretched, and Kahn is

> trying to balance the books... but it does seem

> like his 'go to' is raising taxes/charges (10%

> council tax increase, a congestion charge for all

> of greater London of 5.50 a day, and the

> 'temporary' increase of the existing congestion

> charge to 15quid a day last year), rather than

> cutting waste/improving efficiencies/increase

> borrowing (at least for the short term).....if

> times were normal, I might prepared to be more

> accepting, but a 'tax first' attitude in the

> current environment is a real kick in the nuts for

> a lot of people.


That does rather presuppose that there is a lot of waste to be cut or a significant amount of efficiency that can be driven in the short term (as opposed to say automation that will take investment and time). Since the GLA is only really responsible for two really significant things: Transport (60% of the budget) and police (25% of budget); it seems tricky to see where the big savings could come from.


Perhaps short term borrowing is an answer, but they did take on an additional ?1bn of debt for crossrail and as part of the TfL shortfall on passenger revenue. They may also be looking to keep their powder dry in case passenger revenues don?t significantly recover this year (which I doubt they will).

I agree council tax spike is harsh but the funds need to come from somewhere.

Savings from efficiencies; that?s definitely do-able.

It would be more palatable to chase businesses that do not fair enough tax.


Efficiencies in wider government / borough spending would also be welcome

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...