Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually seenbeen, TFLs debt was reducing under

> Khan, until the pandemic hit. All the figures are

> online for you to see for yourself. The money he

> now wants, is to offset the loss of income from

> massively reduced passengers due to the pandemic.

> You might also want to look at the part the

> government are playing in fueling that debt too ;)


So he decided to give it the kiss of death by unnecessarily allowing free fares. Then he tells everyone that the bus drivers will die.

This is hilarious (kind of!)


Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn?t it Hancock saying London is heading for

> lockdowns well?

>

> What would Khan?s hidden agenda be?

>

> Are Hancock and Johnson in on this hidden

> agenda??????


99 - 100 coming ready or not


I see you Sadiq hiding behind your mamma

I see you Matt hiding behind the sofa


Sigh too easy

Seems to me the only thing I can remember about this guy was him saying something about terrorism being part and parcel of living in a large city, or something like that. It was a clumsy thing to say, albeit a helpful one for those claiming that Islam is the root of all evil (it's from the horse's mouth, right?) though he did clarify what he meant afterwards, and he did do a pretty good job of explaining what he really meant. Apart from that I don't really know much else about him - and maybe that's rather telling.


He was an easy target for Trump.


I think he's probably a nice bloke really, but he'll almost certainly continue to take hits for being the man "in charge" whilst violent crime on London streets - especially amongst ethnic minorities (though not his) - has been a massive problem. He was on the radio a lot when knife crime was still making big news, arguing for more police. I suppose his time in office has coincided with Corbyn's. That can't have been 100% helpful to him whether you like JC or not. And London's been going through a tough time for the past few years with all that's been going on. Not all Sadiq Khan's fault obviously. I'd still have a pint with him.

To be fair to him, what he said was being prepared to deal with terrorist attacks was part of living in a major city. Having the resources to deal with the fallout from any attack


That seems entirely reasonable and not clumsy to me - any mayor of any City should hold that view

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peter whittle

>

>

> Didn?t know you?d gone to so much trouble there

> seenbeen. Quite the authority

>

> Jesus wept


It got better



Khan is unprofessional in the extreme....'I can see you're demoralised..','that's quite a slur- but coming from you that's no surprise' personal attacks on Whittle coming from Khan- then they all joined in....

  • 3 weeks later...

Today he is quoted in the evening standard asking for a review of the 10pm curfew as it is counter productive https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/sadiq-khan-10pm-curfew-review-london-counterproductive-a4566116.html


But I seem to remember that around the 21st September the mayor was asking for the 10pm curfew to be introduced. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-london-could-face-fresh-restrictions-under-mayors-new-plan-12077137


Confused dot com or as some papers might say

"Last orders for Mayor in u-turn fiasco"

  • 2 weeks later...
When I first started drinking 10.30 or even 10 was last orders. Pubs were shut in the afternoon, and Sunday's were even worse, in some parts (mainly parts of Wales) they were closed. Not sure if the little Englanders want to return to these halcyon days, or perhaps before WW1 when there were no limits. There were differences within London on drinking hours, and when I lived in Abingdon we had summer hours (11 close), it was very exciting when we moved to 11pm all year.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No

> He wants it revoked and to revert to normal

> drinking hours (see this tweet from today)

> https://twitter.com/MayorofLondon/status/131853111

> 4680668160?s=19

>

> As I said previously u turn by London mayor ?


I thought he supported the Welsh plan of a 3 week lockdown


He's now saying level 2 lockdown means people can't mix outside their bubble in pubs - I'm not sure pubs keep to that seeing what happens outside .


Anyway the creation of level 4 can't be far away - figures just reported on Sky News are a nightmare.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Someone I know who as family in Italy.told me pubs

> and restaurants were shutting at 10pm .as

> instructed to .but then were reopening about 10-15

> pm.as there were no guild lines as to when they

> could reopen.not sure if that's true.


Macron saw this coming in Paris and switched to a proper 9:00PM curfew


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-54585828

  • 2 months later...

I understand finances are stretched, and Kahn is trying to balance the books... but it does seem like his 'go to' is raising taxes/charges (10% council tax increase, a congestion charge for all of greater London of 5.50 a day, and the 'temporary' increase of the existing congestion charge to 15quid a day last year), rather than cutting waste/improving efficiencies/increase borrowing (at least for the short term).....if times were normal, I might prepared to be more accepting, but a 'tax first' attitude in the current environment is a real kick in the nuts for a lot of people.


He's lucky Shaun Bailey seems so inept as an alternative candidate....


https://www.cityam.com/london-tories-council-tax-hike-is-a-result-of-mayors-mistakes/

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understand finances are stretched, and Kahn is

> trying to balance the books... but it does seem

> like his 'go to' is raising taxes/charges (10%

> council tax increase, a congestion charge for all

> of greater London of 5.50 a day, and the

> 'temporary' increase of the existing congestion

> charge to 15quid a day last year), rather than

> cutting waste/improving efficiencies/increase

> borrowing (at least for the short term).....if

> times were normal, I might prepared to be more

> accepting, but a 'tax first' attitude in the

> current environment is a real kick in the nuts for

> a lot of people.


That does rather presuppose that there is a lot of waste to be cut or a significant amount of efficiency that can be driven in the short term (as opposed to say automation that will take investment and time). Since the GLA is only really responsible for two really significant things: Transport (60% of the budget) and police (25% of budget); it seems tricky to see where the big savings could come from.


Perhaps short term borrowing is an answer, but they did take on an additional ?1bn of debt for crossrail and as part of the TfL shortfall on passenger revenue. They may also be looking to keep their powder dry in case passenger revenues don?t significantly recover this year (which I doubt they will).

I agree council tax spike is harsh but the funds need to come from somewhere.

Savings from efficiencies; that?s definitely do-able.

It would be more palatable to chase businesses that do not fair enough tax.


Efficiencies in wider government / borough spending would also be welcome

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...