Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Closed because it's another traffic one - Admin


As a result of the recent LTN and permeable filters off Lordship Lane, the traffic has increased to unbearable levels. As a cyclist myself, I am all for the measures to encourage safe active travel, however, I think the approach that has been taken is far from equitable. It is simply not fair that residents of Lordship Lane are now forced to suffer from idling traffic at all hours of the day. Lordship Lane has always been dangerous for cyclists as vehicles frequently exceed the 20mph speed limit which is not enforced.


I am having difficulty understanding how this traffic will ever decrease, there are members of our society who rely on a motor vehicle for travel & as (almost) all of the roads into the Village are now closed, there are no alternative routes for this traffic to take.


Is there anything that can be done to campaign for a more fair approach to reducing pollution in the area? Lordship Lane seems to have been ignored in all of the proposals. This is bringing misery to the lives of residents and businesses, not to mention the children of Harris Academy Primary School on Lordship Lane.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/263960-traffic-on-lordship-lane/
Share on other sites

By 'permeable filters off Lordship Lane' do you mean every road suddenly closed off by boulders and barriers to cars and motorcyclists?


Southwark must be wasting so much money with their signage. The green ones state obviously that the roads can be passed by pedestrians and cyclists.

One Dulwich is campaigning for a more equitable approach: https://www.onedulwich.uk/


This is the Southwark Streetspace Comments page. This is where the council is asking those (both in favour and against) to comment: https://eastdulwichstreetspace.commonplace.is/


It might also be worth writing to the following councillors:


[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is why I was careful to specify "the true definition"! A bit like "dilemma", generally used for any tricky decisions but should really be where there are only two options, both with equally bad outcomes...
    • I raise your pedantry. Language evolves and Merriam Webster gives the meaning as "drastically reduced especially in number." The word originally derived from the Roman practice of killing every tenth soldier in a mutinous army but I'm sure nobody uses the word in that context now.
    • Thanks all for the replies.  When the roofer come to look at the roof more recently,  there were holes in the felt in the same place that the original leak had been,  as well as where the new leak is.  There doesn't seem to be a reason why a hole the the felt was the cause of one leak and not the other.  It would have been good to have got everything sorted at the same time,  rather than having to put scaffolding up again.  But my main issue is around the vagueness of a 10 year guarantee.  After work was done the first time,  the roofer gave us a summary of the work and just wrote '10 Yr guarantee' after, without specifying what exactly that means.   If a roofer comes and doesn't diagnose the problem quite right (which i imagine is common with roofs, given it's not always clear what's causing a leak), the guarantee doesn't seem to apply. But anyway,  we'll be getting a different roofer, because we think he should have checked the felt under the tiles the first time round.  
    • We used to feed the birds, but once the parakeets discovered this they just took over, scaring away all the other species and eating everything in sight. I tried scaring them away with a Nerf gun, but they just didn't care. I know it will open a can of worms (no pun intended) but I really think  the parakeet population needs to be reduced; yes they are pretty, but they are just like a plague of locusts when it comes to food supplies.  PS apologies for pedantry @malumbu but the true definition of "decimate" is to reduce by a tenth... 🫤
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...