Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just to add EDguy, that the nonsense about Wayfair furniture, is directly evolved from the nonsense about pizza deliveries in the John Pedosta emails. That is where it started and given that it is wikileaks that leaked those emails, every conspiracy theorists favourite go to source, it becomes pretty easy to follow the trajectory of these cults. Also typical of cults, is the obsession with symbolism and secret signs, another facet that pervades the Q Anon cult.

> But they also mention pizza a lot and other fast

> food deliveries, because guess what, campaign

> teams work pretty much 24/7 during an election,

> and that means lots of takeaway food.


Here is the link to the email on wikileaks stating that Obama flew in $65k worth of 'hot dogs' from Chicago to the White House in 2009. The election years were 2008 and 2012. Not only are they very expensive hot dogs, but they would have been extremely cold by the time they arrived.


https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/12/1223066_re-get-ready-for-chicago-hot-dog-friday-.html


This is just one example. I'm not saying this is proof by any means, but to state that the references to takeaway food are innocent is naive at best.

EDguy89 Wrote:


> Still got a link to this item? What is the "known

> pedophelia symbol"?



Sure, here you go:


https://www.wayfair.co.uk/lighting/pdp/isabelle-max-bucareli-night-light-u000090468.html?rtype=8&redir=U000090468



The symbol resembles the little boy lover one as confirmed by the FBI


https://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/File:FBI-pedophile-symbols-page1.jpg



This provides more detailed info into the Wayfair story. I see the night light that I found is one of those that have been questioned.


https://orwell1984366490226.wordpress.com/2020/07/12/are-missing-children-being-trafficked-on-wayfair/


Coincidence? Maybe. Questionable? Absolutely

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robbie, this is just getting silly now. In no way

> is Obama involved with, or ever has been involved

> with, the trafficking of children. Stop

> embarrassing yourself.



Aww poor Blah Blah. Couldn't address the evidence provided which refuted your previous statement, without trying to resort to insults. That is your forte after all.


Show everyone on the doll where the Trump supporter hurt you.

What evidence? You have provided nothing! And you can ditch the troll reverse psychology too. You come onto a forum and try to claim that some ridiculous nonsense about pizza and hotdogs dreamed up by Trump sycophants implicates innocent people in criminal acts, and dare to ask me for evidence to disprove you? There are accounts in existence for everything spent by every President and government office. Had it ever occurred to you that catering bills for the government runs in millions? No of course it hadn't. You are so far into the rabbit hole you have lost all grasp on reality. That you then double down when called out on it is just embarrassing for you.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> But they also mention pizza a lot and other fast

> food deliveries, because guess what, campaign

> teams work pretty much 24/7 during an election,

> and that means lots of takeaway food.



The email I provided disproves your statement.


I'm not sure why you couldn't, and still can't bring yourself to admit the fact that it's questionable.


Mind you, the way you seemingly laugh at the theories involving children, aggressively attacking those who mention it is alarming and very suspicious.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-wayfair-human-trafficking/fact-check-no-evidence-linking-wayfair-to-human-trafficking-operation-idUSKCN24E2M2


False. There is no evidence linking Wayfair to a human trafficking operation.



Real human slavery/trafficking support organisations are not happy about this.


https://polarisproject.org/press-releases/polaris-statement-on-wayfair-sex-trafficking-claims/


of course they could be all in on it - the journalists at reuters, the support staff at Polaris - but I doubt it.

Robbie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The email I provided disproves your statement.

>

> I'm not sure why you couldn't, and still can't

> bring yourself to admit the fact that it's

> questionable.

>

> Mind you, the way you seemingly laugh at the

> theories involving children, aggressively

> attacking those who mention it is alarming and

> very suspicious.


No it does not. And yes, I will laugh at 'theories' that are the invention of some bored armchair conspiracy theorists, whether they involve children or not. So will most people who understand the difference between that and credible corroborated evidence.


Read this yet?


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-65000-hot-dogs/


Need any more links that show the pizzagate theory for the nonsense it is, or are you going to double down yet again?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...