Jump to content

Tighter restrictions/ second national lockdown aka circuit breaker?


Recommended Posts

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Exactly BB, it's the predictability of Brexit that

> makes it more unique than all those events cited

> above. Life, as well as politics, is full of ifs,

> buts, maybes, and sliding doors moments, but from

> the beginning Brexit was always a right-wing,

> nationalist, power grab project, so no one should

> be surprised we've ended up with a right-wing,

> nationalist, power grab Gov...


Pig-ignorance of what is/was going on in the rest of the country as usual...stupid ignorant lefty opinionated blinkered twats who are too tight to pay the going rate for building work etc and just sit back in their ?1 million terraced houses and are totally unaffected by what is going on in poorer areas .

What was the point of giving loads of money to those unelected fools in Brussels with their ?120 bottles of wine and then THEM telling US how to spend the money they so 'kindly' give back to us. All our infrastructure has been fiddled with by the Brussels morons in some sort of division of assets across the Eurozone and the UK lost out BIG TIME.

Since being in or out of the EU does not affect you whingeing morons you should shut up!

In the words of Anne Widdecombe- 'We're Off!'

?1 million homes ?

Oh I see, you're aiming that comment at the little people.


A mere ?1 million is basically a flat in East Dulwich nowadays, isn't it ?


Out of interest UG, what's your perceived value of your house ?

Presumably about 89p, the way you seem to have a grudge against those with only ?1 million.


(accidentally sent the above as a PM. Sorry UG, was meant for all, not yours alone)


uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Exactly BB, it's the predictability of Brexit

> that

> > makes it more unique than all those events

> cited

> > above. Life, as well as politics, is full of

> ifs,

> > buts, maybes, and sliding doors moments, but

> from

> > the beginning Brexit was always a right-wing,

> > nationalist, power grab project, so no one

> should

> > be surprised we've ended up with a right-wing,

> > nationalist, power grab Gov...

>

> Pig-ignorance of what is/was going on in the rest

> of the country as usual...stupid ignorant lefty

> opinionated blinkered @#$%& who are too tight to

> pay the going rate for building work etc and just

> sit back in their ?1 million terraced houses and

> are totally unaffected by what is going on in

> poorer areas .

> What was the point of giving loads of money to

> those unelected fools in Brussels with their ?120

> bottles of wine and then THEM telling US how to

> spend the money they so 'kindly' give back to us.

> All our infrastructure has been fiddled with by

> the Brussels morons in some sort of division of

> assets across the Eurozone and the UK lost out BIG

> TIME.

> Since being in or out of the EU does not affect

> you whingeing morons you should shut up!

> In the words of Anne Widdecombe- 'We're Off!'

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 2. If there had been no Falklands War there would

> be no Thatcher in 1983 and we would have had the

> experiment of the third way (the SDP)


Interesting list of 'what ifs' but this is one of those truisms that turns out not to be true. A few years ago I looked through detailed polling and voting info from Ipsos MORI for 1981-83 and here's the summary:


1. Labour were not miles ahead in the polls before the Falklands War broke out in April '82. In early '81, at the depths of the recession, they were at least 10% ahead in the polls, but by Dec '81-Feb '82 (two months before the War started), the lead was down to between 0 and 3% and their average poll rating was 31% - barely 3% more than their eventual showing in the '83 general election and less than the 33-36% they were polling from October '82 to Feb '83.


2. The 'Falklands factor' theory ignores the huge impact of the SDP / Alliance on the years from '81 to '83. Between November '81 and the outbreak of the war, the combined Alliance polling was between 30 and 44%, but after this honeymoon period it was the Tories who benefited from a decline in Alliance support rather than Labour. There's no evidence that this had anything to do with Falklands.


3. The economy (in GDP terms) was picking up from the depth of the '80-'81 recession and by early '83 was showing strong growth. Despite their best intentions, many people vote with their wallets and Thatcher benefited from this in '83.


4. Labour did not put up a credible platform for voters outside their core constituencies, without which they couldn't hope to win power.


Now back to the pandemic...

Where to begin?

We're at the stage where Johnson needs to go and we have a Gov of National Unity. The current Tory party is incapable of governing on its own, it's purged what decent experienced politicians it had over Brexit, and we're now left with a cabinet of the all the talentless.

And a reminder that in less than 9 weeks we exit the Brexit transition period, a time set aside for Gov and business to get everything ready for being outside the single market and the economic hit to the economy that will entail on top of the Covid costs, yet business still doesn't know what this 'oven-ready' deal will finally look like. A refusal to extend this period during a global pandemic is tantamount to gross negligence, a complete lack of duty of care to the well-being of this country and it's citizens...

They seem to be still striving for a deal though, so I'm not convinced they really are prepared to go no deal on Brexit. They backed themselves into a corner on both Brexit and the Pandemic, by promising things that can not be delivered. It is their mess to sort, but it won't be them who pay for it sadly.

Back to the thread, shocking incompetence. Part of me is hoping that they would get it right (delaying lockdown). But it is groundhog day. Takes me back to March, when I was hoping we'd have a few more weeks of freedom so we could get football almost finished and I could go on my Easter hols. But in retrospect we acted several weeks too late. And the bitter irony is that we are making it far worse for our economy by delaying rather than protecting it. We will now need two inquiries.


Trying to look for a clip where Johnson turns round to his party in PMQs like it was a pantomime (oh no he didn't) but his gives to some of the gist

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...